Showing posts with label Permian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Permian. Show all posts

Monday, April 19, 2010

What is Mass Extinction? Are we heading towards other extinction?

Climate change was at the root of some of the major extinction events of the past.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi

Presently environmentalists are concerned about the imbalance caused by human activity and industrial growth in the ecosystem, as it is slowly inundating the forest cover, thereby reducing considerably the area of natural habitat of animal and plant life. It is also affecting adversely the human community in general as it disturbs the natural cycles of critical materials such as water, oxygen, nitrogen or carbon dioxide. Biocide is occurring at an alarming rate. Experts say that at least half of the world’s current species will be completely gone by the end of the century. Wild plant-life is also disappearing. Most biologists say that we are in the midst of an anthropogenic mass extinction. Numerous scientific studies confirm that this phenomenon is real and happening right now. Should anyone really care? Will it impact individuals on a personal level? Scientists say, “Yes!”
Are we heading towards other extinction as it happened in geological past?

Two main sorts of extinction are recognized – background extinction and mass extinction. The focus here is on mass extinction, observed at intervals throughout Phanerozoic history.

Embedded in the fossil record is a story of adaptation and recovery following catastrophic episodes in which many species become extinct within a geologically short time. Such episodes are called mass extinctions. Most people are aware that the dinosaurs became extinct about 65 million years ago, at the boundary between the Cretaceous (K) and Tertiary (T) periods. But many are not aware that other animal and plant species were also affected. Approximately one-quarter of all known animal families living at the time, including marine and land dwelling species, became extinct at the end of the Cretaceous period. This mass disappearance of species is clearly evident in the fossil record. It is the reason that early paleontologists selected this particular stratigraphic horizon to represent a major boundary in the geological timescale.

The great K-T extinction is not unique, nor was it the most dramatic of such occurrences. There have been at least 5 and possibly as many as 12 mass extinctions during the past 250 million years. The most devastating of these occurred 245 million years ago at the end of the Permian period, when as many as 96 percent of all species died out. Another great extinction occurred at the end of the Triassic period, and several earlier extinctions affected marine organisms.

What causes mass extinctions? Some evidence suggests that the K-T extinction may have been caused by a giant meteorite impact. If an extraterrestrial body such as a meteorite or a comet 10 km in diameter struck the Earth, it could cause massive environmental devastation. The effects could include earthquakes, tsunamis, widespread fires, acid rain, atmospheric particulates that might cause global darkness, and intense climate changes. Evidence for these and related effects has been found in the K-T boundary. Throughout the world the boundary is also marked by a thin layer of clay that is rich in the element iridium (Ir). This is consistent with an influx of extraterrestrial material, because meteorites contain a great deal of iridium compared to the amount contained in terrestrial rocks.

It is possible that a meteorite impact caused the K-T extinction, but the causes of other major extinctions are not as clear. Many scientists feel that some extinctions-particularly the great marine extinctions of the Paleozoic era-were more likely caused by climatic or other environmental changes than by catastrophic events such as meteorite impacts.

The first event recognized by at least some paleontologists as mass extinction actually occurred in Precambrian time. Its exact timing is uncertain, but it happened near the very end of the Proterozoic era. The organisms most notably involved were the soft bodied Ediacarans, although some species of algae seem to disappear at about the same time. If such an event occurred, what was it cause? Sediments from this time period have been examined carefully for excess Ir, which might record an impact, but none has been found. With the available (admittedly scanty) evidence, the best explanation seems to be that the preferred habitat of the Ediacaran animals- shallow water environments-was drastically reduced in amount because of falling sea levels. Analysis of the sediments still preserved from late in Precambrian time suggest that there were repeated cycles of rising and lowering water levels. One of the largest lowerings, also known as regression, during this time appears to coincide with the extinction of the Ediacarans.

Indeed, it is widely believed that sea level change, particularly the lowering of sea level, was a major factor in many of the extinctions in the geologic record. Biological activity is typically high in shallow seas, and times of high sea level provide abundant habitats for marine life, but when the seas withdraw, many of these organisms become extinct. The total range of sea level fluctuations over the past six hundred million years appears to have been very large, at least 200 meters.

The spectacular nature of events at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary has tended to obscure the overwhelming importance of the Permian-Triassic extinctions, which saw the end of most of the species then existing in the oceans. The devastation on land was only moderately less extreme. The nature of life on earth was radically changed, and the effects are with us today in the form of all living plants and animals. The cause of this event – or events- are unclear, but it is generally acknowledged that rather severe conditions would have been required to exterminate such a large fraction of life on earth.

The picture that seems to be emerging from Permian-Triassic studies is very different from that of the K-T boundary. The Permian-Triassic record is one of complex extinction patterns in the face of complex and partly interrelated environmental change. No heat, clear-cut culprit has been identified, but much has been learned about the mechanisms of extinction. Nevertheless, the links between cause and effect are still quite tenuous.

The Permian–Triassic (P–Tr) extinction event, informally known as the Great Dying, was an extinction event that occurred 251.4 million years ago, forming the boundary between the Permian and Triassic geologic periods. It was the Earth's most severe extinction event, with up to 96 percent of all marine species and 70 percent of terrestrial vertebrate species becoming extinct; it is the only known mass extinction of insects. Fifty-seven percent of all families and 83% of all genera were killed. Because so much biodiversity was lost, the recovery of life on earth took significantly longer than after other extinction events. This event has been described as the "mother of all mass extinctions". The pattern of extinction is still disputed, as different studies suggest one to three different pulses. There are several proposed mechanisms for the extinctions; the earlier peak was likely due to gradualistic environmental change, while the latter was probably due to a catastrophic event. Possible mechanisms for the latter include large or multiple bolide impact events, increased volcanism, or sudden release of methane hydrates from the sea floor; gradual changes include sea-level change, anoxia, increasing aridity, and a shift in ocean circulation driven by climate change.
Triassic–Jurassic extinction event - 205 Ma at the Triassic-Jurassic transition. About 23% of all families and 48% of all genera (20% of marine families and 55% of marine genera) went extinct. Most non-dinosaurian archosaurs, most therapsids, and most of the large amphibians were eliminated, leaving dinosaurs with little terrestrial competition. Non-dinosaurian archosaurs continued to dominate aquatic environments, while non-archosaurian diapsids continued to dominate marine environments. The Temnospondyl lineage of large amphibians also survived until the Cretaceous in Australia (e.g., Koolasuchus).
At least half of the species now known to have been living on Earth at that time went extinct. This event vacated ecological niches, allowing the dinosaurs to assume the dominant roles in the Jurassic period. This event happened in less than 10,000 years and occurred just before Pangaea started to break apart.
Statistical analysis of marine losses at this time suggests that the decrease in diversity was caused more by a decrease in speciation than by an increase in extinctions.
Several explanations for this event have been suggested, but all have unanswered challenges:
1.
Gradual climate change or sea-level fluctuations during the late Triassic. However, this does not explain the suddenness of the extinctions in the marine realm.
2. Asteroid impact, but no impact crater has been dated to coincide with the Triassic–Jurassic boundary (the impact responsible for the annular Manicouagan Reservoir occurred about 12 million years before the extinction event).
3. Massive volcanic eruptions, specifically the flood basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province, would release carbon dioxide or sulfur dioxide and aerosols, which would cause either intense global warming (from the former) or cooling (from the latter).


The Late Devonian extinction was one of five major extinction events in the history of the Earth's biota. A major extinction occurred at the boundary that marks the beginning of the last phase of the Devonian period, the Famennian faunal stage, (the Frasnian-Famennian boundary), about 364 million years ago, when nearly all of the fossil agnathan fishes suddenly disappeared.
A second strong pulse closed the Devonian period. Overall, 19% of all families and 50% of all genera went extinct. Although it is clear that there was a massive loss of biodiversity towards the end of the Devonian, the extent of time during which these events took place is uncertain, with estimates ranging from 500,000 to 15 million years, the latter being the full length of the Famennian. Nor is it clear whether it concerned two sharp mass extinctions or a series of smaller extinctions, though the latest research suggests multiple causes and a series of distinct extinction pulses through an interval of some three million years. Some consider the extinction to be as many as seven distinct events, spread over about 25 million years, including particularly notable extinctions at the ends of the Givetian, Frasnian, and Famennian stages.
By the late Devonian, there were plants, insects, and amphibians on land, fish in the seas, and huge reefs built by corals and stromatoporoids. The extinction seems to have only affected marine life. The causes of these extinctions are unclear. The leading theories suggest that changes in sea level and ocean anoxia, possibly triggered by global cooling or oceanic volcanism, were most likely responsible, although the impact of an extraterrestrial body such as a comet has also been considered. Some statistical analysis suggests that the decrease in diversity was caused more by a decrease in speciation than by an increase in extinctions.
The Ordovician–Silurian extinction event or quite commonly the Ordovician extinction, was the third-largest of the five major extinction events in Earth's history in terms of percentage of genera that went extinct and second largest overall in the overall loss of life. Between about 450 Ma to 440 Ma, two bursts of extinction, separated by one million years, appear to have happened . This was the second biggest extinction of marine life, ranking only below the Permian extinction. At the time, all known life was confined to the seas and oceans More than 60 per cent of marine invertebrates died including two-thirds of all brachiopod and bryozoan families. Particularly affected were brachiopods, bivalves, echinoderms, bryozoans, and corals. The immediate cause of extinction appears to have been the continental drift of a significant landmass into the south polar region, causing a global temperature drop, glaciation, and consequent lowering of the sea level, which destroyed species' habitats around the continental shelves. Evidence for this was found through deposits in the Sahara Desert. When Gondwana passed over the south pole in the Ordovician, global climatic cooling occurred to such a degree that there was widespread continental glaciation. This glaciation event also caused a lowering of sea level worldwide as large amounts of water became tied up in ice sheets. A combination of this lowering of sea level, reducing ecospace on continental shelves, in conjunction with the cooling caused by the glaciation itself are likely driving agents for the Ordovician mass extinction. These extinctions are currently being intensively studied; the most commonly accepted theory is that they were triggered by the onset of a long ice age, perhaps the most severe glacial age.
There was other theory too regarding extinction. Scientists from the University of Kansas and NASA have suggested that the initial extinctions could have been caused by a gamma ray burst originating from an hypernova within 6,000 light years of Earth (within a nearby arm of the Milky Way Galaxy). A ten-second burst would have stripped the Earth's atmosphere of half of its ozone almost immediately, causing surface-dwelling organisms, including those responsible for planetary photosynthesis, to be exposed to high levels of ultraviolet radiation. This would have killed many species and caused a drop in temperatures. While plausible, there is no unambiguous evidence that such a nearby gamma ray burst has ever actually occurred.
New Theory On Largest Known Mass Extinction In Earth's History:
The largest mass extinction in the history of the earth could have been triggered off by giant salt lakes, whose emissions of halogenated gases changed the atmospheric composition so dramatically that vegetation was irretrievably damaged. An international team of scientists has reported in the most recent edition of the Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Dokladi Earth Sciences). At the Permian/Triassic boundary, 250 million years ago, about 90 percent of the animal and plant species ashore became extinct. Previously it was thought that volcanic eruptions, the impacts of asteroids, or methane hydrate were instigating causes.
The new theory is based on a comparison with today's biochemical and atmospheric chemical processes. According to Dr. Ludwig Weißflog from the Helmholtz-Center for Environmental Research (UFZ) "Our calculations show that airborne pollutants from giant salt lakes like the Zechstein Sea must have had catastrophic effects at that time".

Based on the findings the researchers were able to form their new hypothesis: At the end of the Permian Age the emissions of halogenated gases from the Zechstein Sea and other salt seas were responsible in a complex chain of events for the world's largest mass extinction in the history of the earth, in which about 90 percent of the animal and plant species of that time became extinct.

The Holocene extinction is the widespread, ongoing extinction of species during the present Holocene epoch. The large number of extinctions span numerous families of plants and animals including mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and arthropods; a sizeable fraction of these extinctions are occurring in the rainforests. Between 1500 and 2009 CE, 875 extinctions have been documented by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources However, since most extinctions go undocumented, scientists estimate that during the 20th century, between 20,000 and two million species actually became extinct, but the precise total cannot be determined more accurately within the limits of present knowledge. Up to 140,000 species per year (based on Species-area theory) may be the present rate of extinction based upon upper bound estimating.
In broad usage, Holocene extinction includes the notable disappearance of large mammals, known as megafauna, starting 10,000 years ago as humans developed and spread. Such disappearances have normally been considered as either a response to climate change, a result of the proliferation of modern humans, or both.
Over 10,000 scientists in the World Conservation Union have compiled data showing that currently 51 per cent of known reptiles, 52 per cent of known insects, and 73 per cent of known flowering plants are in danger along with many mammals, birds and amphibians. It is likely that some species will become extinct before they are even discovered, before any medicinal use or other important features can be assessed. A new study suggests that global warming could threaten one-fourth of the world's plant and vertebrate animal species with extinction by 2050.

The causes of biocide are a hodge-podge of human environmental “poisons” which often work synergistically, including a vast array of pollutants, pesticides, a thinning ozone layer which increases ultra-violet radiation, human induced climate change, habitat loss from agriculture and urban sprawl, invasions of exotic species introduced by humans, illegal and legal wildlife trade, light pollution, and man-made borders among other many other causes.

There is considerable circumstantial evidence that climate change was at the root of some of the major extinction events of the past. Competition, especially competition for food, is another reason for extinction, although it is unlikely to be a dominant one in mass extinctions. It has been argued that competition was responsible for the minor role played by mammals during the Mesozoic.

The list of possible agents of mass extinction is quite long. It contains mechanisms ranging from the exotic to the ordinary; some examples are explosion of a nearby Supernova, which would have bathed the earth in lethal radiation, the effects of plate tectonics moving continents into and out of favorable climatic belts, and the rise and fall of sea level.

Summary:

Major Extinction Events
1.
488 million years ago : a series of mass extinctions at the Cambrian-Ordovician transition (the Cambrian-Ordovician extinction events) eliminated many brachiopods and conodonts and severely reduced the number of trilobite species.
2. 444 million years ago : at the Ordovician-Silurian transition two Ordovician-Silurian extinction events occurred, and togther these are ranked by many scientists as the second largest of the five major extinctions in Earth's history in terms of percentage of genera that went extinct.
3. 360 million years ago : near the Devonian-Carboniferous transition (the Late Devonian extinction) a prolonged series of extinctions led to the elimination of about 70% of all species. This was not a sudden event the period of decline lasted perhaps as long as 20 million years, and there is evidence for a series of extinction pulses within this period.
4. 251 million years ago : at the Permian-Triassic transition Earth's worst mass extinction (the P/Tr or Permian-Triassic extinction event) killed 53% of marine families, 84% of marine genera, about 96% of all marine species and an estimated 70% of land species (including plants, insects, and vertebrate animals). The "Great Dying" had enormous evolutionary significance: on land it ended the dominance of the mammal-like reptiles and created the opportunity for archosaurs and then dinosaurs to become the dominant land vertebrates; in the seas the percentage of animals that were sessile dropped from 67% to 50%. The whole of the late Permian was a difficult time for at least marine life - even before the "Great Dying", the diagram shows a late-Permian level of extinction large enough to qualify for inclusion in the "Big Five".
5. 200 million years ago : at the Triassic-Jurassic transition (the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event) about 20% of all marine families as well as most non-dinosaurian archosaurs, most therapsids, and the last of the large amphibians were eliminated.
6. 65 million years ago : at the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition (the K/T or Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event) about 50% of all species became extinct. It has great significance for humans because it ended the reign of the dinosaurs and opened the way for mammals to become the dominant land vertebrates; and in the seas it reduced the percentage of sessile animals again, to about 33%. The K/T extinction was rather uneven some groups of organisms became extinct, some suffered heavy losses and some appear to have got off relatively lightly.
7. Present day : the Holocene extinction event. A 1998 survey by the American Museum of Natural History found that 70% of biologists view the present era as part of a mass extinction event, possibly one of the fastest ever. Some, such as E. O. Wilson of Harvard University, predict that man's destruction of the biosphere could cause the extinction of one-half of all species in the next 100 years. Research and conservation efforts, such as the IUCN's annual "Red List" of threatened species, all point to an ongoing period of enhanced extinction, though some offer much lower rates and hence longer time scales before the onset of catastrophic damage. The extinction of many megafauna near the end of the most recent ice age is also sometimes considered a part of the Holocene extinction event.

Reference:

Bambach, R.K.; Knoll, A.H.; Wang, S.C. (December 2004). "Origination, extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity". Paleobiology 30 (4): 522–542.

Barry, Patrick L. (January 28, 2002). "The Great Dying". Science@NASA. Science and Technology Directorate, Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA.

Bowring SA, Erwin DH, Jin YG, Martin MW, Davidek K, Wang W (1998). "U/Pb Zircon Geochronology and Tempo of the End-Permian Mass Extinction". Science 280 (1039): 1039–1045.

Cloud, P. 1987. Oasis in space, earth history from beginning. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

Jin YG, Wang Y, Wang W, Shang QH, Cao CQ, Erwin DH (2000). "Pattern of Marine Mass Extinction Near the Permian–Triassic Boundary in South China". Science 289 (5478): 432–436.

Jr. Dickey, J. S. 1996. On the rocks. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.

Labandeira CC, Sepkoski JJ (1993). "Insect diversity in the fossil record". Science 261 (5119): 310–5.
Macdougall, J.D. 1996. A short history of planet earth, mountains, mammals, fire, and ice. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.

Sole, R. V., and Newman, M., 2002. "Extinctions and Biodiversity in the Fossil Record - Volume Two, The earth system: biological and ecological dimensions of global environment change" pp. 297-391, Encyclopedia of Global Enviromental Change John Wiley & Sons.

Wanjek, Christopher (April 6, 2005). "Explosions in Space May Have Initiated Ancient Extinction on Earth". NASA. http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/starsgalaxies/gammaray_extinction.html. Retrieved 2008-04-30.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/28jan_extinction.htm. Retrieved March 26, 2009.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_event
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Devonian_extinction
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordovician%E2%80%93Silurian_extinction_event
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090330102659.htm
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0412_060412_global_warming.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2008/02/the-6th-great-m.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4797-earth-faces-sixth-mass-extinction.html
http://life7.beyondgenes.com/

Thursday, July 2, 2009

No Forest No Oxygen.

Can Deforestation bring down oxygen level?
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi

Deforestation, or the removal of forests, is a major problem that has devastating effects all over the world. Europeans began clearing forests more than 500 years ago. The invention of modern machinery made the process even easier. By the end of the 19th century, most of the deciduous forest of North America, Australia and New Zealand had been cleared. In the 21st century, tropical forests are being cut and burned at alarming rates in South America and Southeast Asia. Asia as a whole has already lost about 90 percent of its forests.

With forest resources--"the lungs of the Earth"-- under attack in many regions, some have raised concerns about the planet's oxygen supply.

Oxygen is the most abundant chemical element, by mass, in our biosphere, air, sea and land. Oxygen is the third most abundant chemical element in the universe, after hydrogen and helium, but mainly in combination with something else. The stuff is all around us but we don’t see it. Chemically joined with other elements it accounts for more than a quarter of Earth’s total weight and almost half the mass of the crust. Free or dissolved molecular oxygen, however, represents only 0.01 percent of the total crust, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere taken together. Only seven of every billion atoms takes the form of molecular oxygen (O2), plus a neglible quantity as atomic or singlet O and ozone (O3). If the atmosphere contained much more oxygen, it would be inflammable. Remove oxygen and only anaerobic bacteria could survive.

How did plants come to alter the atmosphere? The key is the way in which plants create their own food. They employ photosynthesis, in which they use light energy to synthesize food sugars from carbon dioxide and water. The process releases a waste gas, oxygen. Those of us in the animal kingdom rely on oxygen to metabolize our food, and we in turn exhale carbon dioxide as a waste gas. The plant use this carbon dioxide for more photosynthesis, and so on, in a continuing system.

Oxygenic photosynthesis (synthesis by light) is by far the largest and most familiar source of O2. Upon its introduction at precariously trivial and fluctuating levels perhaps 2.8 aeons ago, oxygen began to play a role in the evolution of life and earth’s surface processes. After that, if not earlier, photosynthetic O2 and perhaps plate tectonism joined sunlight, gravity, and water as lead players on the evolutionary stage. Yet, for another 6 to 8 geocenturies it remained at vanishing low levels as a result of reactions with a variety of reduced substances.

Nor was oxygen-evolving photosynthesis the only source of oxygen. Physical splitting of H2O by photolysis was probably the prevailing initial process. Photolysis of CO2, as well as the release of oxygen from the metallic oxides as a result of microbial processes and chemical weathering, are potential but poorly understood sources.
On reaching present levels, perhaps 4 geocenturies ago, oxygen was still consumed by new reduced volcanic gases, erosionally exhumed carbon, and reduced matter in the hydrosphere right up to the present. Levels fluctuate with rates of erosion volcanism, and deforestation. The indefinite continuity of oxygen is not guaranteed.

Forests, a major source of oxygen to our atmosphere, are very important to the world’s climate because they help in rain formation and absorb carbon dioxide (CO2) from the air. As the forests disappear, the weather will change, and some places will dry up.

There are many benefits that we get from our forests. Some of these include cleaner drinking water, a home for plants and animals, economic growth, clean air, recreational opportunities. Another most important benefit we get from trees is called oxygen. If there were no trees to give us oxygen to breath, we would not be able to live. Trees are known as the oxygen supplier to our planet.

As vast forests such as the Amazon are denuded of their beauty and natural resources, our atmosphere is also seriously altered. The forests are stripped faster than they can be replanted, and when severely depleted, photosynthesis is greatly reduced. No photosynthesis, no oxygen. No oxygen, no life. But deforestation continues at a break neck speed in many areas of the world.

Earlier in Jharkhand forest played major role in balancing the temperature difference. But now forest cover is rapidly depleting. Even one of the biggest forest of Asia popularly known as Saranda Forest is also decreasing many fold due to rampant iron ore mining in Jharkhand State. Today the remaining forest areas are unevenly distributed. Bokaro has only 4.4% of area under forest. Similarly Sahebganj has only 2.31%, Dhanbad 12.72%, Deoghar 9.5% and Ranchi only 23.37% of area under vegetation.

At the Survey and Settlement (1902-1910) the area under forests in the Ranchi districts approximated to about 2,281 square miles, i.e. about 32 percent of the total land area of the district. At the Revisional Survey and Settlement (1927-1935) this area shrank to about 1,956 square mils, i.e. 27 percent of the total land area. Thus during a period of 25 years, 325 square miles of forests had disappeared. When the forests were notified under the Bihar Private Forests Act,1946 and demarcation was done only about 1,065 square miles were found under forests in this district. Adding 213 square miles of reserve forests to this, the total area under forest in this district came to 1,278 square miles. Thus in course of a decade over 600 square miles of forests disappeared. Now it has reached up to 23 percent and gradually decreasing further.
The unusually high concentration of oxygen gas on Earth is the result of the oxygen cycle. The biogeochemical cycle describes the movement of oxygen within and between its three main reservoirs on Earth: the atmosphere, the biosphere, and the lithosphere. The main driving factor of the oxygen cycle is photosynthesis, which is responsible for modern Earth’s atmosphere. Photosynthesis releases oxygen into the atmosphere, while respiration and decay remove it from the atmosphere.

Regarding percentage of oxygen present in the atmosphere in the geological past, it was revealed that air bubbles trapped in fossilized amber had been analyzed and found to contain oxygen levels of 38%. Yet today it is well known that the average content of the oxygen in air is only 19% to 21%. If we believe on the report of oxygen level in the fossilized amber, it appears that since the early history of our earth there has been a stunning decrease of 50% in the average oxygen content of the air we breathe. According to other report, analysis of the air in various parts of the world today reveals the frightening fact that the oxygen content continues to decline. In fact in some of the larger and therefore more polluted cities the oxygen levels have been measured at a disturbing level of 12 to 15%. Scientists claim that anything under 7% oxygen content in the air is too low to support human life, even for short periods.

Historical trends, as explained in Atmospheric Oxygen, Giant Paleozoic Insects and the Evolution of Aerial Locomotor Performance by R. Dudley, JExB, show a high of about 35% just before the beginning of the Permian, with a rapid decline to a low of about 13-14% near the beginning of the Triassic, then a small spike at about 17% in mid Triassic, another drop to about 14-15% early in the Jurassic, a sudden climb to about 21% by mid-Jurassic, then a gentle climb to about 26% early in the Tertiary, and a rather constant, steady decline to the present "20.9%."
Our planet’s future is under threat as cutting back tropical forests we put our supply of oxygen gas at risk.
There is difference in opinion about oxygen depletion. Some scientists believe that our atmosphere is endowed with such an enormous reserve of this gas that even if we were to burn all our fossil reserves, all our trees, and all the organic matter stored in soils, we would use up only a few percent of the available oxygen. No matter how foolishly we treat our environment heritage, we simply don’t have the capacity to put more than a small dent in our oxygen supply.

But we can’t take any risk. If forest or plants provide oxygen, cutting or burning trees is definitely going to affect the oxygen balance of our atmosphere.

Sources:

Cloud,P. 1988. Oasis in space, earth history from the beginning. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/quarterly/co2_article/co2.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen
http://www.sdpo.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=41&Itemid=61
http://www.columbia.edu/cu/21stC/issue-2.1/broecker.htm

Friday, April 10, 2009

Paleoenvironmental implications of the Boron content of coals.

Paleoenvironmental implications of the Boron content of coals with special reference to Jharkhand coals of India.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
Abstract:
71 channeled samples of coals of Permian age from eight coalmines in the Jharkhand State of India were collected. The boron content ranges from BDL to 35ppm. and is well within the range of most world coals. Average ash% (30.12) is high. Boron was analyzed in coal ash using Spectrophotometer. The close similarity of boron in the coals under study and other lower Gondwana basins of India are broadly attributed to the uniform sources. Coals under study have low boron content, and were deposited under fresh water influence during the early stages of coalification.

Introduction:
The geochemistry of coal is an integral part of any modern study dealing with coal characterization, owing to the possible presence in the coal of toxic and industrially undesirable elements that exceed the legal limits for emission of such substances. A coal seam formed from material deposited in a brackish water environment may contain undesirable elements; for example, sulphur and elements that form sulphides and sulphates. Boron is an element that is sensitive to the environment of deposition and, therefore, can be used to delineate the area(s) of a coalfield influenced by brackish water conditions during deposition.

Interest in the elemental composition of coal has been on the increase worldwide mainly as a result of growing environmental problems.

Our interest in the boron content of coals is of several reasons. It has been suggested that boron presumably derived from the coke may affect the mechanical properties of certain steels. Coal has been considered as a source of graphite for use as a moderator in nuclear reactors, but the content of boron in the graphite must not exceed 2 ppm. The levels of soluble boron coming from washery wastes and fly ash disposal areas should be checked to ensure that undesirable amounts of boron are not being added to nearby rivers or lakes. Some fly ashes could be useful as soil supplements, but plants should be monitored to ascertain whether the boron from fly ash is enhancing or retarding their growth. Similar effects should also be considered during reclamation projects after coal –mining. From geochemical point of view, the content of boron is interesting because it indicates whether the environment involved fresh, mildly brackish, or brackish water conditions during the early stages of coalification. The investigation has been done on Australian coals (Swaine, 1971) and Canadian coals (Goodarzi, 1988; Banerjee and Goodarzi, 1990; Gentzis et.al.1990).

The Permian coal deposits constitute 98% of the total coal reserves of the country. The
geology of the ancient Indian shield consists of extensively mineralized rock in vicinity
of Gondwana coal basins, it is but normal that the coal ash would be rich in many heavy
metals derived from the respective terrains.

Objectives:
The purpose of this paper is to determine the boron content in different coal seams of different coalfields of Jharkhand State, to discuss the mode of occurrence of Boron in the coals and to evaluate the relation between the boron content in Permian coals of Jharkhand and environment of deposition.

Methodology:

71 channel samples of Gondwana coals of Jharia, East Bokaro, Ramgarh, South Karanpura, North Karanpura and Hutar coalfield (fig.1) were collected for study. Samples were ashed in platinum crucibles in muffle furnace at 5000c. for 6 hours. Boron was determined in the ash through Spectrophotometer (Beckman DB-G, Grating Spectrophotometer). Analysis as described by Pollock (1975) was followed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:
Boron content in coals:

Results for boron in coal are given in table-1. The range for world coals being 0.5-2456ppm boron, but most would probably be between 5 and 400ppm boron (Swaine, 1990). Average concentration (19.70 ppm) of boron in coal samples under study is well within the range of most world coals. Boron content show little variation in all the coal samples collected from Karharbari and Barakar Formations. Average ash% is high (30.12). At best this is blendable variety.

Mukherjee et.al (1982) studied spectrochemically the coals of Karharbari and Barakar Formation of the coal field under study and observed that Boron content is in range of 10-30 ppm in Dobari Quarry of Jharia coal field, 5 ppm in Kusunda open cast mine of Jharia coal field, 10-60 ppm in East Bokaro coal field, 10-20 ppm in Ramgarh coal field, 10-30 ppm in Argada coal field, 5-15 ppm of Dakra seam of North Karanpura coal field and 5-10 ppm in Hutar coal field.

Boron content in the other Indian coals is in range of 25-28ppm boron in Rajmahal Purnea belt, 5-27ppm in Mahanadi coalfields, 5-31ppm in Son valley, 10-30ppm in Satpura valley, 18-21ppm in Wardha coalfield, and 12-38ppm in Godavari valley (Mukherjee et.al.1982). 10-30ppm boron has been reported from Tertiary coals of NW India (Chandra and Singh, 1994). The close similarity of boron in the coals under study and other coals of Gondwana basins may be broadly attributed to the more uniform nature of the major contributory sources of the Gondwana coals.

Mode of occurrence:

The boron in coals is thought to be mostly organically bound. An inverse relationship between boron and the ash content of the coals has been mentioned by many authors as being indicative of the organic affinity of boron (Butler,1953; Goodarzi,1988; Swaine, 1990; Beaton et al.,1991). Inorganically bound boron is usually associated with the clay minerals, mainly illite (Bouska and Pesek, 1976; Kler et.al., 1987). But in the research area we cannot make any assumptions regarding organic or inorganic affinity of boron as the correlation value between ash% and boron is low (r = -13.6). It may be organically bound.

Relation between the boron content in coals of Jharkhand and environment of deposition:
Boron as an indicator of the paleosalinity of the sedimentation environment has been a subject of many investigations. Goldschmidt and Peters (1932) pointed out for the first time the relation between the high boron content in sea water and the boron content in sea water and the boron content in marine sediments. Later Goldschmidt (1958) stated:
"The supply of boron from the ocean among the various types of sediments, really dominates the geochemistry of this element".

Further work on Swedish sediments indicated that the boron concentrations in marine and non-marine sediments differ significantly (Landergren,1945). The boron content of seawater is 4440 ppb, while that of river water is 10 ppb (Li, 1982).

This is the basis for the use of boron as a salinity indicator. The basis for using the amount of boron in clays, coals, or other materials as an indicator is that seawater contains 4.6ppm boron compared with less than about 0.1ppm boron in most rivers and other terrestrial waters (Goodarzi and Swaine, 1994). The question is, do clays and coals assimilate boron from the waters in which they are deposited and retain it during the diagenesis and later processes? There is an experimental evidence that clays remove some boron from aqueous solutions. For example Kaolinite, Montmorillonite, and Illite extract boron from solutions, but not to the same extent (Hingston, 1964).

Another experimental study showed that the removal of boron from natural waters depended on both the salinity and the boron content of the solution. These experiments confirmed that adsorption is the mechanism for the initial intake of boron. In general, Illites fix more boron than Kaolinites or Montmorillonites, depending mainly on the boron concentration in solution, but also on pH, ionic strength, and temperature (Goodarzi and Swaine, 1994).

In view of the usefulness of the boron content of clays for indicating, at least approximately, the degree of salinity in terms of marine, brackish water, and fresh water, several attempts have been made to use the boron content of sediments associated with coals. Shales from the part of Appalachian coal basin in Pennsylvania, U.S.A. was investigated and was found the following mean values for boron content: 44ppm boron (fresh water), 92ppm boron (brackish water), and 115ppm boron (marine) (Degens, et.al. 1957;Keith and Degens, 1959). On the basis of work on some sediments in Ruhr region of Germany it was suggested values of 15 to 45ppm boron for fresh water conditions and 90 to 190ppm for marine conditions (Ernst et.al. 1958). In the Hat Creek coals in the south-central British Columbia there are two of the thickest sub-bituminous coal deposits in the world, and formed in a fresh water, lacustrine environment (Goodarzi and Van der Flier-Keller,1988). They contain 5 to 32 ppm boron, which indicates freshwater conditions consistent with other evidence (Goodarzi and Gentzis,1987).
The above studies support the use of boron along with other parameters for determination of the depositional environments of sediments.

On the basis of different results and further work, it was suggested that the following scale of value is applicable (Swaine,1971).

Up to 40ppm boron: fresh water-influenced coals.
40 to 120ppm boron: brackish-water influenced coals.
> 120ppm boron : marine, seawater influenced coals.

Following a reappraisal of earlier work and taking into account of recent work on Canadian coals and Australian coals (Goodarzi and Swaine,1994) , it is proposed that the terms identifying the degrees of salinity and their associated boron concentrations should be changed to fresh water (F), mildly brackish water (MB) and brackish water (B). The new range and categories are.

Up to 50ppm boron: fresh water-influenced coals (F).
50 to 110ppm boron: mildly brackish-water influenced coals (MB).
> 110ppm boron: brackish-water influenced coals (B).

According to above classifications it may be concluded that the Jharkhand coals, which contain low boron, content, were fresh- water influenced during the early stages of coalification.

Acknowledgement:

Author is grateful to Mr. F. Goodarzi, Geological Survey of Canada, for his useful suggestions to improve the paper.

References:
Banerjee, I. and Goodarzi, F. (1990). Paleoenvironment and sulfur-boron contents of the

Mannville (Lower Cretaceous) coals of Southern Alberta, Canada. Sedimentary Geology, v.67,pp.297-310.

Beaton, A.P., Goodarzi, F. and Potter, J. (1991). The petrography, mineralogy and geochemistry of a Paleocene lignite from southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Int. J. Coal Geol., v.17, pp. 117-148.

Bouska, V. and Pesek, J. (1976). The geochemical role of boron in the carboniferous sediments of Czechoslovakia. 7th Conf. Clay Mineralogy and Petrology (Karlovy Vary), pp.203-209.

Butler, J.K. (1953).Geochemical affinities of some coals from Svalbord (Spitzbergen). Nor. Polarinst. Skr, 96, pp. 1-26.

Chandra, D. and Singh, M.P. (1994). Geochemical comparisons of the Lower Gondwana coals of Peninsula with the tertiary coals of Extra-Peninsular India. Indian Minerals, v.48,N0.3, pp.157-166.

Degens, E.T., Williams, E.G. and Keith, M.L. (1957). Environmental studies of Carboniferous sediments Part I: Geochemical criteria for differentiating marine and fresh water shales. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Bulletin, v.41, pp. 2427-2455.

Ernst, W., Krejci-Graf, K. and Werner, H. (1958). Parallelisierung von Leithorizonten im Ruhrkarbon mit Hilfe des Bor-Gehaltes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v.14,pp.211-222.

Gentzis,T., Goodarzi, F. and Lali, K. (1990). Petrographic study of Upper Cretaceous brackish-water coals from Vesta Mine, east central Alberta. Current Research, Part D, Geological Survey of Canada, pp. 187-193.

Goldschmidt, V.M. and Peters, C. (1932). On the geochemistry of boron. Gesallschaft der Wissenschaften zu Goettingen Mathematisch- Physikalische Klasse. Nachrichten V, pp. 528-545.

Goldschmidt,V.M. (1958). Geochemistry. Clarendon, Oxford, pp.730.

Goodarzi, F. and Gentzis, T. (1987). Depositional setting determined by organic petrography of the Middle Eocene Hat Creek No. 2 coal deposit, British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v.35, no.2, pp.197-211.

Goodarzi, F. and Van der Flier-Keller, E. (1988). Distribution of major, minor and trace elements in Hat Creek Deposit No.2, British Columbia, Canada. Chemical Geology, v.70, pp. 313-333.

Goodarzi, F. (1988). Element distribution in coal seams at the Fording Coal Mine, British Columbia, Canada. Chemical Geology, v.68, pp.129-154.

Goodarzi, F. and Swaine, D.J. (1994). Paleoenvironmental and Environmental Implications of the Boron content of coals. Geological Survey of Canada, Bull.471, pp.14-17.

Hingston,F.J.(1964). Reactions between boron and clays. Australian Jr. of Soil Research, v.2, pp. 83-95.

Keith,M.L. and Degens, E.T. (1959). Geochemical indicators of marine and fresh-water sediments.In: P.H. Abelson (Ed.), Researches in Geochemistry. Wiley, New York, pp.38-61.


Kler, V.R., Valkova, G.A., Gurvich, E.M., Dvornikov, A.G., Zarov, Ju. H., Kler, D.V., Nenachova, V.F., Saprikin, F.J. and Spirt, M.J. (1987). Metallogeny and geochemistry of coal-and-shale bearing strata of the Soviet Union. Nauka, Moscow, pp. 239 (in Russian).

Landergren, S. (1945). Contribution to the geochemistry of boron:II. The distribution of boron in some Swedish Sediments, rocks and iron ores. The boron cycle in the upper lithosphere. Arkiv foer Kemi, Mineralogi och Geologi, v. 19A no.26, pp. 31.

Li, Y.H. (1982). A brief discussion on the mean oceanic residence time of elements. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta., v. 46, pp. 2671-2675.

Mahadevan, T.M. (2002). Geology of Bihar and Jharkhand. Geological Society of India, Bangalore, pp. 376.

Mukherjee, K.N., Raja Rao, C.S., Chowdhury, A.N., Pal, J.C. and Das,M.(1982). Trace elements studies in the Major Tertiary and Gondwana Coalfields of India. Bulletins of the Geological Survey of India, Series-A, v.49, pp.45-62.

Pollock, E.N. (1975). Trace impurities in coal by wet chemical methods. In: S.P. Babu (Ed.), Trace Elements in Fuel. Advances in Chemistry Series, no.141, American Chemical Society, pp. 23-24.

Swaine, D.J. (1971). Boron in the coals of the Bowen Basin as an environmental indicator. In: A. Davis (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Bowen Basin Symposium. Geological Survey of Queensland, Report, v.62, pp.129-154.

Swaine, D.J.(1990). Trace elements in coal. Butterworths and Co.Ltd. London, pp.278.



Saturday, August 23, 2008

Coals are best indicators of ancient climate


Coals are best indicators of ancient climate.

By

Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
Palaeoclimatology, the study of climates during the geological past, is one of the most topical areas of research in the geosciences at present. The threat of future climate change caused by higher levels of greenhouse gases, which would drastically alter many aspects of our environment, has prompted much research to try to understand how our complex climate system works. Only by understanding how climate has evolved over million of years can we identify important climate cycles with a frequency in excess of the short climate records we possess. These climate cycles have the potential to have a profound effect on our environment.

Understanding our climate history in the geological past is also important for climatologists trying to construct accurate numerical computer models of our present climate system to use for predicting future climate change.

Basic information about past climates comes from understanding how climate influences certain sedimentary systems, floras and faunas on earth today and extrapolating this information back to interpret geological evidence.
The formation of some rock types is directly influenced by aspects of climate. Some of the most useful are coals, evaporates, glacial deposits and carbonates. I am presenting only a brief resume of coal as a paleoclimatic indicators.

Coal- climatically sensitive rock:

The presence of coal, initially formed from the accumulation of plant material as peat, is generally taken to indicate warm and wet humid climates ideal for lush plant growth, and where the rainfall is higher than the rate of evaporation, such as in equatorial regions. However, rainfall is more important factor than temperatures, as are high water tables and waterlogged swamps (mires) which are required to preserve the peat.
Coal seams are composed of genetic coal types which are determined to a certain extent by the character of the particular type of vegetation. A careful analysis of all the available data on geochemical, palynological and petrological constituents of the coals reveals that there existed distinctive types of vegetation associated with different peat types. The character and relation between the miospore assemblage and petrographic type reflect particular environment, topography and climatic conditions.
Pollen and spores commonly retain their morphological characteristics through all stages of coal formation. They bear specific relationship to the original geological and botanical setting.

In the past, the most abundant coal deposits were formed during the Carboniferous when large subsiding continental areas were situated in low latitudes and experienced hot and humid climates. The great Carboniferous forests were composed of the pithy-stemmed clubmosses and lycopods, such as Lepidodnedron, Sigillaria and Calamites, which grew to giant sizes in the hot wet conditions and formed thick layers of peat as they collapsed into waterlogged swamps. The disappearance or decrease in size of these water- loving plants at the end of the Carboniferous marked the onset of much drier conditions in low latitude regions during the Permian. Extensive forests dominated by glossopterid plants lived on all southern continents and their remains form extensive and some economically important and coal deposits today.

A discussion on depositional environment of Permian peat swamp phases may well be preceded by the remarks that, based on different analysis and support from geological setup, Karharbari, Barakar, and Raniganj Stages of Lower Gondwanas of India were climatically controlled. The climate during the Karharbari period was rather cold as evidenced by flora and by possible effects of glaciation in Talchir Series. On the contrary, climate during Barakar and Raniganj commenced with cool and humid climate gradually becoming warmer and humid as evidenced by flora and coal composition. Humidity seems to have recurred in some part of Raniganj Stage also.
In the early period of the Permian, coal formation took place under the relatively cold, humid, shallow water deposition mainly from arborescent vegetation.

Chemistry of Coal-bed and paleoclimate:

The chemical arguments for the interpretation of paleoclimate from coal beds come principally from the work of different geologists. Their work was partly in response to studies purporting to show that high-sulfur coals were influenced by marine sedimentation. They argued that peat that forms economic coal cannot form in seawater because ash and sulfur enrichment is too great there. Thus they concluded that all economic coals were originally freshwater peats. They further concluded that, if all economic coal beds were derived from freshwater peats, ash content must be indicative of climate, and they proposed the following model, which predicts three types of peat:
1. anaerobic (permanently waterlogged) peat with pH less than 4.5, which would give rise to low-ash, low-sulfur, vitrinite-rich coals;
2. anaerobic with pH greater than 4.5, which would give rise to high-ash, high-sulfur, liptinite-rich coals; and
3. intermittently aerobic peat, which would give rise to low-sulfur, moderately high-ash, inertinite-rich coals.
Boron element in coal as a Paleosalinity Indicator:
The concentration of boron in Australian and Canadian coals was determined in order to assess the variation of boron in coal with respect to rank, age, geological setting and the degree of paleosalinity of the coal forming environment. The boron content of seams is sensitive to the environment of deposition and may show the variation in the same seam laterally due to changes to the environment of deposition and /or the enrichment of boron by secondary source.
It is proposed that the following ranges of values for boron in coal indicate the degree of marine influence during the early stages of coalification:
1. up to 50 ppm (parts per million) boron- coal formed in a freshwater environment.
2. 50 to 110 ppm boron – coal formed in a mildly brackish water environment.
3. greater than 110 ppm boron- coal formed in a brackish water environment.
Coal petrography and paleoclimate:
Vitrinite-rich coal beds are generally regarded to have been deposited in wet conditions, usually meaning high water tables, especially if the coal beds have clay partings and inclusions of syngenetic pyrite . Inertinite-rich coal beds are generally regarded to have been deposited in dry conditions, usually meaning relatively low or fluctuating water tables.


Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Mining and other operations destroying fossils of Jharkhand State of India.

Mining and other operations destroying fossils of Jharkhand State of India.

By
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi

Large scale mining and other operations in Jharkhand State of India are destroying the plant fossils of the Jurassic and Permian age. Lack of proper preservation arrangements, coupled with reckless mining works are ruining “a veritable storehouse of geological history”. Fossils of Jurassic age in Rajmahal area of Jharkhand state are being used to build up roads. Due to lack of knowledge, awareness and government ignorance these fossils are dangerously set on the path to destruction.
Plant fossils of Permian age which are spread over Damodar Valley coalfields are also being destroyed due to mine blasting or crushed under the huge tyres of trucks.

The situation is a combination of factors including extensive mine blasting and natural weathering process whose ‘baleful impact upon the life of the plant fossils has not been minimized due to the indifference of the organization concerned.

“There is an urgent need to conserve the rich fossil site. It is essential to preserve the plant fossils in ancient conditions,”.

According to the recent report a Memorandum of Understanding was inked between the Jharkhand government, Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany (BSIP), Lucknow, and the National Building Construction Corporation, (NBCC), under the umbrella of the Department of Science and Technology of Government of India to establish the park. The Lucknow-based BSIP, a premier research centre in the field of palaeobotany, will provide scientific inputs and consultancy services to the park. But what about the fossils of Damodar Valley Coalfields? Decision of making fossil park has come too late. Till today most of the fossils have been destroyed .

Major plant fossils of the Permian age in Jharkhand State are Glossopteris, Gangmopteris, Schizoneura, Vertebraria, Noeggerathiopsis etc. Jurassic fossils are Lycoxylon indicum, Cladophlebis lobata, Ptilophyllum aquitifolium etc.

An angiosperm fruit of uncertain affinity and a questionable flower are reported from the Rajmahal Formation (Early Cretaceous) at the locality of Sonajori, Rajmahal Basin. The remains of ferns, Pentoxylales and conifers have been described previously from this locality. The significant addition of angiosperm megafossil remains confirms that flowering plants were evolving during the Early Cretaceous Epoch in India. The Sonajori assemblage seems to be the youngest fossil assemblage recovered so far from the Rajmahal Basin. It is tentatively dated as Barremian–Aptian.

Mr. Birbal Sahni was the first botanist to study extensively the flora of Indian Gondwana. He also explored the Rajmahal hills which is a treasury of fossils of ancient plants. Here he discovered some new genus of plants. The important and interesting ones are Homoxylon rajmehalense, Rajamahalia paradora and Williamsonia sewardiana.

Stromatolites in Jharkhand:
Stromatolites have the distinction of being by far the oldest indicators of organized life on earth, ranging back over 3 billion years. They occur all on continents in rocks from middle Precambrian to Holocene age. Stromatolites are laminated limestone structure of simple to complex form commonly attributed to debris-binding and biochemical processes of benthonic blue-green, green, and possibly, red algae.
Iron ore groups (Archaean age) of Jharkhand and bordering Orissa need pointed reference as they have the potential to constrain concepts of early evolution of life and also the age of the Iron Ore Group. These relate to the occurrence of palaeobiological remains and the extensive development of carbon phyllites that may have an organic carbon source.
These are found in the chert, jasper, haematite and dolomite beds in the iron-ore formations of the Noamundi-Joda area of Orissa bordering Jharkhand State. Good exposures of stromatolytic dolomite are also found at the base of the iron and manganese formations at Kasia and Belkundi. The stromatolites may be of the stratiform, nodular and columnar types.
Stromatolites have also been recorded Bachra coalfield in North Karanpura coalfield of Jharkhand state. It has been found in Talchir Formation (Permo-Carboniferous). The rock types of Talchir formation in order of superposition comprise tilloides and boulder beds, green shales and varvites with stromatolites. Stromatolites have been recorded by CMPDIL organization for the first time in this area.
They were the dominant life form on Earth for over 2 billion years. Today they are nearly extinct, living a precarious existence in only a few localities.



The term fossil is defined as remains of plants and animals which have existed on the earth in prehistoric times and are found preserved within sedimentary rocks or superficial deposits of the earth, not only mostly as petrified structures of organisms but also whatever was directly connected with or produced by these organisms.


Fossils are recognized as important useful tools since prehistoric times. Prehistoric men and medicine men of certain primitive cultures have believed them as magic sticks with mysterious powers and have used them to treat the evil spirits. Students concerned with the past of the earth have used as guide to reconstruct the geologic history of the earth. Paleontologists have used them in reconstructing the story of the plants and animals and of the past. They have also obtained useful information about when, where, and how the fossil animals and plants lived. Economic geologists have used the fossils as chief indicators in oil exploration.

Most of our knowledge about the climatic conditions in the geologic past comes from the study of the fossils. The presence of a fossils of warmer region in colder parts indicate that the latter once enjoyed a warm climate. The fossil ferns and other plants are usually found associated with coal deposits, which suggest warm and swampy conditions.

The concerned organizations should wake up to the bitter fact of gradual elimination of plant fossils from this region before it is too late.

“This is not to say that mining operations or other construction works in these regions should be stopped but they should be done more judiciously apart from setting up a chain of geological parks in Jharkhand to preserve plant fossils which are indisputably a treasure trove of information about the chronological history of the rocks.


Sunday, June 1, 2008

ARSENIC IN THE WATERS OF JHARKHAND STATE OF INDIA.

ARSENIC IN THE WATERS OF JHARKHAND STATE OF INDIA.
By
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi




Fig: 16 years old girl suffering from arsenic toxicity. This girl belongs to Sahebgunj district of Jharkhand. She is not able to walk properly due to pain in her feet. Her parents are worried about her marriage.



Fig: Man showing arsenic affected areas of his body.

Fig: Aersenic filter installed by the local administration in arsenic affected areas of Sahebgunj district of Jharkhand. (all photos by Kumar Karamvir)


  • INTRODUCTION AND DISCUSSION:
    Arsenic contamination of groundwater has led to a massive epidemic of arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh and West Bengal in India and neighbouring countries. It is estimated that approximately 57 million people are drinking groundwater with arsenic concentrations elevated above the World Health Organization's standard of 10 parts per billion. The arsenic in the groundwater is of natural origin, and is released from the sediment into the groundwater due to the anoxic conditions of the subsurface. This groundwater began to be used after western NGOs instigated a massive tube well drinking-water program in the late twentieth century. This program was designed to prevent drinking of bacterially contaminated surface waters, but failed to test for arsenic in the groundwater. Many other countries and districts in South East Asia, such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Tibet, China, are thought to have geological environments similarly conducive to generation of high-arsenic groundwaters. Arsenicosis was reported in Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand in 1987, and the dissolved arsenic in the Chao Phraya River is suspected of containing high levels of naturally occurring arsenic, but has not been a public health problem due to the use of bottled water.
    An environmental health disaster is unfolding in West Bengal and Bangladesh. Tens of millions of persons in many districts are drinking ground water with arsenic concentrations far above acceptable levels. Thousands of people have already been diagnosed with poisoning symptoms, even though much of the at-risk population has not yet been assessed for arsenic-related health problems. Alarming level of arsenic in the groundwater of eight districts of West Bengal and 2 districts of Jharkhand in East India has become a serious health hazard. The number of people suffering from skin lesions, muscular disorder and even cancer, is constantly going up. This is an acute 'environmental health' problem since the rural population in these districts is solely dependent on groundwater for drinking, bathing and cooking.
    The source of the problem is geological in origin, which has aggravated due to excessive withdrawal of groundwater for paddy cultivation in the wake of the green revolution of the 1970s.
    ARSENIC IN JHARKHAND
    A detailed study has been presented on groundwater metal contents of Sahebgunj district in the state of Jharkhand, India with special reference to arsenic. Both tubewell and well waters have been studied separately with greater emphasis on tubewell waters. Groundwaters of all the nine blocks of Sahebgunj district have been surveyed for iron, manganese, calcium, magnesium, copper and zinc in addition to arsenic. Groundwaters of three blocks of Sahebgunj, namely, Sahebgunj, Rajmahal and Udhawa have been found to be alarmingly contaminated with arsenic present at or above 10 ppb.
    Rivers flowing through the coal fields of Jharkhand have been reported to carry arsenic responsible for arsenic poisoning in downstream areas of West Bengal. The coal fields of Bachara and Piprawar areas of Jharkhand have contaminated the waters of the Damodar and its tributary, the Safi, causing problems in West Bengal. According to Nitish Priyadarshi, arsenic contamination arises mainly due to the dumping of waste from the coal mines along the river bed. Coals of the area mentioned contains sufficient amount of arsenic as described below.
    Distribution of Arsenic in the water and in the Permian coals of North Karanpura Coalfield of Jharkhand State of India:
    The North Karanpura coalfield, a western most member in the east-west chain of the Damodar Valley Basin, forms a large expanse of coal bearing sediments spread over Hazaribag, Ranchi and Palamau districts of Jharkhand State. It covers a total area of around 1230sq. Km. For the arsenic study, samples from coal from Badam, Kerendari, KDH, Rohini, Dakra and Karkatta were analysed by the author. Molybdenum-blue Colorimetry was used as the chemical technique for arsenic determination as recommended by the International Standard Organisation. Concentration of arsenic in coal samples range from 0.01 to 0.49ppm with an arithmetic mean of 0.15ppm. (Priyadarshi, 2004). Concentration of arsenic is low compared to most world coals. Average ash% is very high (up to 32.51%).
    To understand the environmental impact of arsenic in coals of research area, water and sediments were analysed for arsenic concentration. Concentration were moderately high (2 ppm) in the sediments of local streams flowing through the coal mining area. Average concentration of arsenic in the sediments of mine water was 1.4 ppm. Though the concentration of arsenic is low in the surface water ( 0.001-0.002 ppm) it may still affect the local habitants especially during summer season when the consumption of water increases many folds. People of this area is consuming water from several years. Effects of arsenic will be there if the people of the area consume water containing arsenic for longer periods.

    Real truth is that people of the area are ignorant about this toxicity. Few people know about this but due to lack of pure source of water they are helpless and are forced to depend on the contaminated water.
    Local communities of the Sahebgunj district in the state of Jharkhand, are already showing sign of arsenic toxicity. Sufferers are complaining about body ache, skin problems, nausea etc.


    General Source of arsenic
    Arsenic is widely distributed throughout the earth's crust.
    Arsenic is introduced into water through the dissolution of minerals and ores, and concentrations in groundwater in some areas are elevated as a result of erosion from local rocks.
    Industrial effluents also contribute arsenic to water in some areas.
    Arsenic is also used commercially e.g. in alloying agents and wood preservatives.
    Combustion of fossil fuels is a source of arsenic in the environment through disperse atmospheric deposition.
    Inorganic arsenic can occur in the environment in several forms but in natural waters, and thus in drinking-water, it is mostly found as trivalent arsenite (As(III)) or pentavalent arsenate (As (V)). Organic arsenic species, abundant in seafood, are very much less harmful to health, and are readily eliminated by the body.
    Drinking-water poses the greatest threat to public health from arsenic. Exposure at work and mining and industrial emissions may also be significant locally.
    Effects:
    Chronic arsenic poisoning, as occurs after long-term exposure through drinking- water is very different to acute poisoning. Immediate symptoms on an acute poisoning typically include vomiting, oesophageal and abdominal pain, and bloody "rice water" diarrhoea. Chelation therapy may be effective in acute poisoning but should not be used against long-term poisoning.
    The symptoms and signs that arsenic causes, appear to differ between individuals, population groups and geographic areas. Thus, there is no universal definition of the disease caused by arsenic. This complicates the assessment of the burden on health of arsenic. Similarly, there is no method to identify those cases of internal cancer that were caused by arsenic from cancers induced by other factors.
    Long-term exposure to arsenic via drinking-water causes cancer of the skin, lungs, urinary bladder, and kidney, as well as other skin changes such as pigmentation changes and thickening (hyperkeratosis).
    Increased risks of lung and bladder cancer and of arsenic-associated skin lesions have been observed at drinking-water arsenic concentrations of less than 0.05 mg/L.
    Absorption of arsenic through the skin is minimal and thus hand-washing, bathing, laundry, etc. with water containing arsenic do not pose human health risk.
    Following long-term exposure, the first changes are usually observed in the skin: pigmentation changes, and then hyperkeratosis. Cancer is a late phenomenon, and usually takes more than 10 years to develop.
    The relationship between arsenic exposure and other health effects is not clear-cut. For example, some studies have reported hypertensive and cardiovascular disease, diabetes and reproductive effects.
    Exposure to arsenic via drinking-water has been shown to cause a severe disease of blood vessels leading to gangrene in China (Province of Taiwan), known as 'black foot disease'. This disease has not been observed in other parts of the world, and it is possible that malnutrition contributes to its development. However, studies in several countries have demonstrated that arsenic causes other, less severe forms of peripheral vascular disease.
    According to some estimates, arsenic in drinking-water will cause 200,000 -- 270,000 deaths from cancer in Bangladesh alone.
    Reference:
    Priyadarshi, N.: Arsenic in Damodar poisoning West Bengal. Indian Express, July 12, 1998.
    Priyadarshi, N. 2004. Distribution of arsenic in Permian Coals of North Karanpura coalfield, Jharkhand. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, 63, 533-536.

    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs210/en/

    http://www.geog.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/arsenic/symposium/session4.html

    http://www.cababstractsplus.org/google/abstract.asp?AcNo=20053111461

    http://nutritionfoundationofindia.res.in/archives.asp?archiveid=72&back=bydate.asp.


    Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
    Geologist and Lecturer
    Department of Environment and Water Management,
    J.N. College
    Ranchi University,
    Ranchi-834001
    India.
    Email: rch_nitishp@sancharnet.in