Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts
Showing posts with label uranium. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 25, 2019

Radon gas- the major threat of indoor air pollution.

Radon is the most important cause of lung cancer after smoking.


By
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi. 
Geologist
email: nitish.priyadarshi@gmail.com



Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas which may be found in indoor environments such as homes, schools, and workplaces. Radon is the most important cause of lung cancer after smoking. All types of houses can have radon problems-old homes, new homes, drafty homes, insulated homes, homes with basements and homes without basements. Construction materials and the way the home has been built may also affect radon levels, but this is rare. A radon level of 4 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) or more is considered high.

Radon is a gas produced by the radioactive decay of the element radium. Radioactive decay is a natural, spontaneous process in which an atom of one element decays or breaks down to form another element by losing atomic particles (protons, neutrons, or electrons). When solid radium decays to form radon gas, it loses two protons and two neutrons. These two protons and two neutrons are called an alpha particle, which is a type of radiation. The elements that produce radiation are called radioactive. Radon itself is radioactive because it also decays, losing an alpha particle and forming the element polonium.

Elements that are naturally radioactive include uranium, thorium, carbon, and potassium, as well as radon and radium. Uranium is the first element in a long series of decay that produces radium and radon. Uranium is referred to as the parent element, and radium and radon are called daughters. Radium and radon also form daughter elements as they decay.


The decay of each radioactive element occurs at a very specific rate. How fast an element decays is measured in terms of the element "half-life", or the amount of time for one half of a given amount of the element to decay. Uranium has a half-life of 4.4 billion years, so a 4.4-billion-year-old rock has only half of the uranium with which it started. The half-life of radon is only 3.8 days. If a jar was filled with radon, in 3.8 days only half of the radon would be left. But the newly made daughter products of radon would also be in the jar, including polonium, bismuth, and lead . Polonium   is also radioactive - it is this element, which is produced by radon in the air and in people's lungs, that can hurt lung tissue and cause lung cancer.

For most people, the greatest exposure to radon occurs in the home. The concentration of radon in a home depends on:
  • the amount of uranium in the underlying rocks and soils;
  • the routes available for the passage of radon from the soil into the home; and
  • the rate of exchange between indoor and outdoor air, which depends on the construction of the house, the ventilation habits of the inhabitants, and the air-tightness of the building.

Radon 222-a naturally occurring radioactive gas that you cannot see, taste or smell- is produced by the radioactive decay of Uranium-238. The other definition is “Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas emitted as a result of the radioactive decay of radium 226 (which is an indirect decay product  of uranium)” .  Most soil and rock contain small amounts of uranium -238. But this isotope is much more concentrated in underground deposits of minerals such as uranium, phosphate, granite, and shale. Radon is found in many types of rocks and soils. Although some rocks and soils contain more uranium (and thus greater radon gas potential) than others, all rocks and soil contain at least trace amount of uranium. According to a report, there are 2.7 pounds of uranium for each 1 million pounds of rock.  Granite, however, contains approximately 4.7 pounds of uranium per 1 million pounds, and back shale contains approximately 3.7 pounds of uranium per 1 million pounds. Sandstone contain 0.5 pounds and basalt contains 0.9 pounds per 1 million pounds. Thus, areas with high granite content and black shale, are more likely to have radon gas.

When radon gas from such deposits seeps upward through the soil and is released outdoors, it disperses quickly in the atmosphere and decay to harmless levels.   However, radon gas can enter buildings above such deposits through cracks in foundations and walls, opening around sump pumps and drains, and hollow concrete blocks. Once inside , it can build  up to high levels, especially in unventilated lower levels of homes and buildings. Although some radiation is emitted from the building materials themselves, such as bricks. In addition, because the air pressure inside a house is generally lower than the pressure of the soil around the foundation ( because of appliances that use air,  such as furnaces), the structure acts like a Vacuum, drawing the radon in from the soil. Radon may also be present in groundwater and can be release into the air through faucets and shower heads.
In the open air, radon generally is diluted into insignificant concentrations. However, when radon is trapped and allowed to concentrate, such as within a building, it presents a serious health threat to the inhabitants.

In many countries, drinking water is obtained from groundwater sources such as springs, wells and boreholes. These sources of water normally have higher concentrations of radon than surface water from reservoirs, rivers or lakes.

Effects of Radon

Radon -222 gas quickly decays into solid particles of other radioactive elements that, if inhaled, expose lung tissue to a large amount of ionizing radiation from alpha particle. When inhaled, the decay of the radon releases solid radioactive particles ( polonium). Although the half life of polonium is only a few minutes, while it is within the lungs, it continues to decay, which releases ionizing alpha radiation. This exposure can damage lung tissue and lead to lung cancer over the course of  a 70 year lifetime. Your chances of getting lung cancer from radon depend mostly on how much radon is in your home, how much time you spend in your home, and whether  you are a smoker or have ever smoked.

In 1998, the National Academy of Sciences estimated that prolonged exposure for a life time of 70 years to low levels of radon or radon acting together with smoking is responsible for 15,000-22,000 ( or 12%) of the lung cancer deaths each year in the United States. This makes the radon the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking.

What are the symptoms of radon in your home?
       persistent cough.  
·         coughing up blood.
·         wheezing.
·         shortness of breath.
·         hoarseness.
·         chest pain, especially when you cough or laugh.
·         frequent infections such as bronchitis and pneumonia.

Prevention

Radon can be controlled in a number of ways, with the control action depending on the level of radon. The primary control actions are to prevent radon from entering the home by either blocking off or sealing potential entry points or to reduce the amount by increasing ventilation.
Sealing or blocking radon entry points may require covering exposed earth in basements, storage areas, drains, and crawlspaces with impermeable materials, such as plastic sheeting pr metal. Cracks and openings can be sealed with mortar or caulking.

Household ventilation, which can push radon out instead of pulling it inside the home, can be increased with strategically placed fans. In addition, by altering the air pressure inside the home, the vacuum effect can be reduced. This can be accomplished by switching the air  source of certain appliances, such as furnaces and clothes dryers, from inside to outside the home.

References:

Miller, G. Tyler Jr. 2004. Environmental Science. Thomson Learning, USA.

Wagner, T. 1994. In our backyard. John Wiley & Sons, INC, New York.



https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-home-guide/radon-poisoning#reducing-radon



Monday, January 14, 2013

Geological history and the importance of pegmatite veins.















Pegmatite, meaning “joined together,” was first applied to graphic granite sometime before 1822. Subsequently, it has been extended to refer to any abnormally coarse grained rock of overall igneous character. The term “pegmatite” was first used by a French mineralogist René Haüy but he used this term as a synonym of graphic granite. Contemporary meaning was given to the rock type in 1845 by an Austrian mineralogist Wilhelm Heidinger.

Most of pegmatites are more than 1 centimeter across; grains up to a meter or two across are relatively common; and individual crystals up to several meters in greatest dimension have been reported. In any case, no matter how large the grains, most pegmatites have typical igneous rock textures.

Pegmatites are associated with plutonic or intrusive rocks and were evidently formed by slow crystallization at considerable depths below the surface.

Individual pegmatite masses may be classified as simple or complex. The simple ones have an overall homogeneity and consist almost wholly of microcline perthite and quartz plus or minus minor amounts of biotite and /or black tourmaline.

The complex pegmatites tend to be compositionally zoned and to contain, along with quartz and microcline, large quantities of clevelandite, noteworthy amounts of muscovite, and well formed crystals of such minerals as apatite, beryl, topaz, colored tourmaline, and spodumene, plus a number of less common minerals that contain elements such as lithium, niobinum, tantalum, cesium, uranium, and the rare earths.

Pegmatites consist of minerals which are found also in the rocks from which they are derived, e.g. granite-pegmatites contain principally quartz and feldspar while gabbro-pegmatites consist of diallage and plagioclase. Rare minerals, however, often occur in these veins in exceptional amount and as very perfect crystals. The minerals of the pegmatites are always those which were last to separate out from the parent rock. As the basic minerals are the first formed the pegmatites contain a larger proportion of the acid or more siliceous components which were of later origin.

Most simple pegmatites occur as dikes within large igneous masses or their surrounding country rocks. Most complex pegmatites occur as lenticular pods or irregularly shaped masses within the country rocks surrounding large masses or as apparently isolated masses within metamorphic rock terranes.

Pegmatites are not rare rocks but their overall volume is small. They form small marginal parts of large magma intrusions known as batholiths. They form as a late-stage magmatic fluid starts to crystallize. This fluid is rich in water, other volatiles, and chemical elements incompatible in main magmatic minerals.

This is the reason why pegmatites are so coarse-grained and why they contain so much unusual minerals. They are coarse-grained because of high volatile content which makes the magma less viscous and therefore enhances mineral growth (chemical elements are free to move to look for and join a suitable and already existing crystal). Unusual minerals form because the fluid is enriched in exotic chemical elements like lithium, boron, beryllium, rare earth elements, etc. These elements are forced to form their own mineral phases because they are rejected by major rock-forming minerals like quartz, feldspar, and others.

Pegmatites are very irregular not only in distribution, width and persistence, but also in composition. The relative abundance of the constituent minerals may differ rapidly and much from point to point. Sometimes they are rich in mica, in enormous crystals for which the rock is mined or quarried (India). Other pegmatites are nearly pure feldspar, while others are locally (especially near their terminations) very full of quartz. They may in fact pass into quartz veins (alaskites) some of which are auriferous.

This wealth of minerals makes pegmatites often valuable as a mineral resource. Pegmatites may be mined because of their high content of feldspars, clay (if weathered), mica, or many metal-bearing minerals. Pegmatite is also a source of gems like beryl, tourmaline, zircon, etc.

Most pegmatites are granites with or without exotic minerals but mafic pegmatites (gabbro, diorite) are known as well. Silica undersaturated (without quartz) magmatic rocks may be also pegmatitic.

Pegmatite intrusions in the rocks in Ranchi city of India.

Above pictures shows the pegmatite intrusions in the rocks of Ranchi city.

The Pegmatite veins are common traversing almost all the rock type of the area. Their width varies from few meters to tens of meters.  Coarse pegmatitic intrusive are quite abundant, though they tend to cluster at places and result in irregular distribution. They are mainly composed of feldspar (with potash feldspars being much more abundant than the plagioclase) and quartz. The other minerals which are present are tourmaline, muscovite and rarely garnet. At places, the pegmatite contains streaks and specks of pyrite.  

Rifle range- This is the highest point of Ranchi, situated in Bariatu, east of Bharamdih hills. The major rock type is granite gneiss with augen shaped crystals of felsic minerals. Large number of intrusions of pegmatites veins is very common in this part . These intrusions are very thick are in the form of sills and dykes, mainly dykes. Pegmatite contain large crystals of tourmaline and garnet. Muscovite is also present in some proportion.

The other hills where the intrusion of pegmatite is seen are Jagnnathpur hill, Tagore hill, Bharamdih hill etc.

Reference:

Dietrich, R.V. and Skinner, B.J. 1979. Rocks and rock minerals. John Wiley & Sons, U.S.A.

Priyadarshi, N. 1998. A handbook geology of Chotanagpur. Aoyushi Publication, Ranchi, India.

http://www.sandatlas.org/2012/09/pegmatite/







Monday, September 20, 2010

Radon in groundwater from India- a brief report.

There have also been a number of reports of the presence of dissolved radon in groundwater from India.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi



Presence of high levels of Radon (222 Rn) has been reported from groundwater in Bangalore city, Keolari-Nainpur area, Seoni-Mandla district in Madhya Pradesh, Bathinda , Gurdaspur, Garhwal, Himachal Pradesh and Siwalik Himalayas and underground waters of the Doon valley in India.

To ascertain the ground reality and the nature of the hazards, if any, a study was conducted by the Central Ground Water Board, Bangalore in and around Bangalore city. The analytical results of all the groundwater samples collected from the gneissic and granitic rocks shows Radon concentration is above the permissible limit of 11.83 Bq/l and at places the concentration is as high as hundred times. The radon gas is occurring in the groundwater of the area ranging from 55.96 Bq/l to 1189.30 Bq/l plus or minus error values.

There is no relation between the radon concentration and the depth of bore wells. However it is observed that the formation waters from very shallow aquifers are having the least concentration of radon due to its easy loss to the atmosphere. Surface water samples are having negligible quantity of radon, which is well within the safe limits. It is observed that there is a good correlation between the presence of high radon content and the presence of granitic rocks.

Higher concentration of uranium and radon in groundwater of Keolari-Nainpur area have been observed during an exploration programmes for uranium. The average value of dissolved uranium in bore well waters is 13 ppb (parts per billion). Considering 200 ppb as a safe limit, it has been possible to delineate several pockets, where groundwater is contaminated by very high uranium ( 217- 4,500 ppb in 13 villages) and radon (34,151 Bq/m3 to 1,146,075 Bq/m3 in 6 villages). These pockets, therefore, have been classified as high background radiation area on the basis of (a) long lived alpha radioactivity through ingestion of more than 2 Bq/day (b) 222Rn concentration on potable water exceeding 200 Bq/m3.

High radon concentration has been reported in river waters of Garhwal and Siwalik
Himalayas and underground waters of the Doon valley. Extremely high uranium content was reported in groundwater of Bathinda district in the Punjab state. The radon concentrations have been measured in all those areas where high uranium content was
reported in groundwater. The average radon concentration in hand-pump drawn water is 3.8 Bq /l and in tube-well drawn water, its value is 3.6 Bq /l. Radon values for Bathinda district are lower than the corresponding values for Gurdaspur district. The occurrence of radon in groundwater is reasonably related to the uranium content of the bedrocks and it can easily enter into the interacting groundwater by the effect of lithostatic pressure. Relatively high concentrations of radon (25–92 Bq/l) were reported for groundwater from Quaternary alluvial gravels associated with uranium-rich sediments in the Doon Valley of the Outer Himalaya.


Radon activities in groundwater samples in different districts of Himachal Pradesh varies from 0.3 ± 0.2 to 792 ± 9 Bq /l. The maximum value of radon concentration is found in groundwater of thermal springs and the minimum value in a water tank. The highest value of radon concentration is recorded in thermal spring (no. III) at Kasol,
792 ± 9 Bq/ l which is in the Kullu district of Himachal Pradesh. The uranium content of water in the Kasol thermal springs was found to be 37.40 ± 0.41 ppb. The radon
anomalies are related to Shat-Chinnjra and Kasol mineralisation. The radon concentration at Chinnjra also shows a high value of 144 ± 4 Bq/ l in natural spring (bauli) as compared to other natural springs at Takrer and Bradha in the same area.

The study was also carried out in Varahi and Markandeya river basins, Karnataka State, India. The measured 222Rn activities in 16 groundwater samples of Varahi command area ranged between 0.2 ± 0.4 and 10.1 ± 1.7 Bq/ l with an average value of 2.07 ± 0.84 Bq /l. In contrast, the recorded 222Rn activities in 14 groundwater samples of Markandeya command area found to vary from 2.21 ± 1.66 to 27.3 ± 0.787 Bq/ l with an average value of 9.30 ± 1.45 Bq /l.

Despite its known health effects, no WHO guideline value exists for radon in drinking water because of the difficulties in defining a regionally-applicable value given the relative importance of inhalation compared to ingestion from drinking water. Radon concentrations in groundwater also change significantly on abstraction, aeration, storage and boiling.

Radon is essentially chemically inert, but radioactive (www. chemistrydaily.com). It is the heaviest noble gas at room temperature. At standard temperature and pressure radon is colorless. Natural radon concentrations in the Earth’s atmosphere are very low, the water in contact with the atmosphere will continually lose radon by volatilization, while groundwater has a higher concentration of 222 Rn than surface water. Likewise, the saturated zone of soil frequently has higher radon content than the unsaturated zone due to the diffusional losses to the atmosphere.

Radioactive substances in ground water, such as radium, uranium and thorium, occur naturally. They are present at least to some extent in almost all rocks and radium, in particular, dissolves more readily into ground water in contact with sands or soils. The acidity of the water, which may be increased by the presence of elevated levels of nitrates associated with agricultural land use, is believed to increase the amount of radium that dissolves into ground water from contact with sands and soils.

There are twenty known isotopes of radon. The most stable isotope is radon-222 which is decay product ( daughter product) of radium-226, has a half life of 3.823 days and emits radioactive alpha particles. Radon-220 is a natural decay product of thorium and is called thoron. It has a half life of 55.6 seconds and also emits alpha rays. Radon-219 as derived from actinium, is called action and is an alpha emitter having a half life of 3.96 seconds.

Radon being the daughter product of the uranium is expected in higher levels in rocks containing uranium. The studies indicate the granits, pegmatites and other acidic rocks are generally rich in uranium compared to other rocks types. When groundwater percolates through rocks rich in uranium, it is expected to contain high level of radon gas in groundwater.

Radon is a carcinogenic gas and is radioactive. It is hazardous to inhale this element, since it emits alpha particles. Radon in water may therefore present dual pathways of exposure for individuals through drinking water and inhalation of air containing radon released from groundwater.

Its solid decay products, and their respective daughter products, tend to form fine dust, which can easily enter the air passage and become permanently stuck to lung tissue, causing heavy localized exposure. Build-up of radon in homes has also been a more recent health concerns and many lung cancer cases are attributed to radon exposure each year. Radon escalates health hazard to smokers.

Reference:

Hunse, T.M., Najeeb, K.Md., Rajarajan, K. and Muthukkannan, M., 2010. Presence of Radon in groundwater in parts of Bangalore. Jour. Geol. Soc. of India, v.75, pp. 704-708.

Sinha, D.K., Shrivastava, P.K., Hansoti, S.K. and Sharma, P.K., 1997. Uranium and radon concentration in groundwater of Deccan Trap country and environmental hazard in Keolari-Nainpur area, Seoni-Mandla district, Madhya Pradesh. Geol. Surv. Ind. Spl. Pub. v.2, no.48, pp. 115-121.

http://www.nj.gov/dep/rpp/download/radwater.pdf
http://www.rsc.org/delivery/_ArticleLinking/DisplayArticleForFree.cfm?doi=b209096c&JournalCode=EM
http://www.wateraid.org/documents/nindia.pdf
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=22900183

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Geobotanical methods for prospecting uranium deposits.


Plants can also help us in finding uranium.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
Fig. Aster Venusta
Name of the plant in the figure below is Astraqualus sp.

Geobotanical methods of prospecting involve the use of vegetation for identification of the nature and properties of the substrate. Paradoxically, these methods are among the easiest to execute and yet the most difficult to interpret of all the methods of exploration available at the present time. In terms of execution, the basic requirement is merely a pair of human eyes; but in the interpretation of the visual (or photographic) image, some knowledge is required of a number of different disciplines such as biochemistry, botany, chemistry, ecology, geology, and plant physiology.

Geobotanical methods of prospecting are based on the visual observation and identification of vegetation or plant cover that may reveal the presence of a specific type of sub-surface mineralization. In this method, it is presumed that a particular variety of plant species is an indicator of a sub-surface uranium molecules. In recent years, geobotanical methods have become useful in the identification of uranium- ore deposits particularly in areas of dense vegetation.

The method dates back to the eight or ninth century, when the Chinese had observed the association of certain plant species with mineral deposits. In the early nineteenth century, the Russian geologist, Karpinsky observed that different plants or plant communities could be indicators of rock formations and that the characteristics of the plants of an area could be used to decipher the geology of the area. The method has evolved over the years and now more than a hundred species have been recognized as indicators of the presence of a number of elements, including ore metals.

Two distinct approaches to geobotanical prospecting for uranium have been developed to cope with specific problems of exploration. The first method is based upon the presence of uranium in all plants in small but measurable amounts. It has been observed that the uranium content of plants rooted in mineralized ground is detectably higher than the uranium content of plants rooted in unmineralized ground. Plant ash is analyzed directly for the determination of uranium content. The uranium content of the ash of plants growing above unmineralized formations is generally less than 1 ppm, whereas that of the plants rooted in ore bodies contain several parts per million (ppm). This technique helps in the broad outlining of mineralized areas.

The second method involves mapping the distribution of certain indicator plants growing in ecologically favourable areas. A plant may be used as an indicator, provided it is established that its growth is controlled by certain factors which are related to the chemistry of the ore deposit. The sandstone type of uranium deposit contains an appreciable amount of selenium and sulphur. The distribution pattern of plants, which require one of these elements for normal growth, may indicate favourable ground for sub-surface uranium mineralization. Plant morphology and physiology are profoundly influenced by the chemical composition of sub-surface ore bodies and groundwater regime.

This method has been used in the USA for locating sandstone type of uranium deposits, particularly in areas where surface expression is lacking. Astragalus pattersoni, which thrives on the direct intake of selenium from ore bodies located up to a depth of 75 feet, was identified as one of the indicator plants for uranium.

Prospecting by both plant analysis and indicator plant mapping in widely separated areas of the Colorado plateau has shown a positive correlation between botanically favourable ground and major ore deposits.

Geobotanical surveys have been carried out in the Satpura-Gondwana basin of Madhya Pradesh and the foot hills of the Himalayas to demarcate mineralized (uranium) sandstone facies. Surveys conducted in the Kangoo basin of Hamirpur district in Himachal Pradesh revealed uranium values in plant ash samples ranging from 4.3 ppm to 96 ppm. Two- fern plants belonging to Adiantum venustum analyzed uranium values of 194 and 634 ppm respectively.

Perhaps the most obvious of all plant mutations is that of changes in the colour of the flowers. Colour changes in flowers are usually the result of either radioactivity or of the presence of certain elements in the soils.

Metal ions as well as radioactivity can affect the colour of flowers. The gardener’s trick of adding iron or aluminium to red hydrangeas to turn them blue is of course well known. The theory behind such colour changes is interesting and may have bearing on mineral exploration.

The majority of flower colours are produced by a surprisingly small number of pigments. Apart from Carotenoids, which are important in yellow and orange flowers, it is mainly the anthocyanins that are responsible for the colour range from orange to deep blue. It was suggested that in the absence of certain metals, the anthocyanins for red oxonium salts which become blue when they are complexed with excessive amounts of iron, aluminium, or other elements.

Besides iron and aluminium, other elements such as chromium and uranium can form stable complexes with anthocyanins. It is therefore possible that excessive amounts of some of these metals could produce a blue tint in flowers that are normally red or pink, and this could be useful field guide in prospecting.

Unusual and unpredictable changes of form are produced by radioactivity. The first result of mild doses of radioactivity is a stimulatory effect on the vegetation. After the nuclear explosion at Hiroshima, exceptional yields of various crops were obtained.

Fortunately, however, natural radiation is never as high as that encountered at Hiroshima in 1945 and levels normally encountered are therefore seldom sufficient to produce an obvious stimulatory effect on vegetation. There is, however, ample evidence that even fairly low levels of radiation can produce morphological changes in plants over a prolonged period. Variations was found in fruit of the bog bilberry ( vaccinium uliginosum) growing in a radioactive area at Great Bear Lake in Canada.

Plants are the only parts of the prospecting prism which extend through several of the layers simultaneously. It is claimed that the main advantage of biogeochemical prospecting compared with other geochemical methods lies in its power of penetration through a non mineralized over burden.

Reference:

Brooks, R.R., 1972. Geobotany and biogeochemistry in mineral exploration. Harper and Row publishers, New York.

Virnave, S.N. 1999. Nuclear geology and atomic mineral resources. Bharati Bhavan, Patna.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Distribution of Uranium in world coals.

Jharkhand coal contains trace amount of Uranium in North Karanpura coal field.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi

Coal is largely composed of organic matter, but it is the inorganic matter in coal—minerals and trace elements— that have been cited as possible causes of health, environmental, and technological problems associated with the use of coal. Some trace elements in coal are naturally radioactive. These radioactive elements include uranium (U), thorium (Th), and their numerous decay products, including radium (Ra) and radon (Rn). Although these elements are less chemically toxic than other coal constituents such as arsenic, selenium, or mercury, questions have been raised concerning possible risk from radiation.


Uranium association with coal has a long history. There is a continuing interest in uranium in coal, because it is a source of radioactivity and because it may be an economic source of uranium. It is just 200 years since the discovery of uranium by M.H. Klaproth. The first detection in coal was by Berthoud (1875) who found up to 2% uranium in coal from near Denver, USA. The samples were collected from a mineralized section of the coal-bed. This mine was soon abandoned.

Subsequent field studies have proven several areas with high uranium coals, especially in the United States, mainly in the Dakotas, Wyoming, Montana, Colorado and New Mexico (Vine,1956). It seems that uranium is carried into the coal swamp in solution as carbonate complexes (Breger, et. al. 1955), which then release uranyl ions to form uranyl-organic complexes. In many coals, especially low-U coals, Uranium is predominantly organically bound.

After World War II, a very intensive uranium search was initiated. The measurement of coal radioactivity were performed in many countries; however only a few are documented. For example, in year 1967 scientists have measured uranium concentration in lignites from Spain (Huesca, Lerida, Ternel, Galicia, Murcia) and reported concentration values 20 to 1200 parts per million (ppm).

Gott (1952) has determined uranium distribution in lignites, shales, and limestones from throughout the US, and a possible mechanism for uranium accumulation in lignites was suggested. Highest uranium concentrations were prevalent in lignites from the Dakotas, Wyoming, and Montana (0.01%), and from high ash Nevada lignite which contained up to 0.05 % uranium. It was postulated that uranium was possibly concentrated in lignite by the action of percolating surface waters after having been leached from volcanic ash.

Uranium bearing coal in the Red Desert area in Wyoming has been studied by Masursky; his findings are documented in several reports. In the first report in year 1952, core and channel samples taken from the Red Desert area in Wyoming were used to investigate the origin of uranium in the coal of the region. Specific uraniferous zones examined included the Sourdough, Monument, Battle, and Luman zones. Areas which were topographically higher and in which coal was overlain by conglomerate showed the highest uranium concentration. Studies of core samples revealed that uranium concentration in the coal beds correlates well with the degree of permeability of adjacent rocks. Where coal beds are overlain or underlain by sandstone, the greatest concentrations of uranium occur at the top and / or bottom of the bed.

J.R. Gill and others in the year 1959 have studied uranium bearing lignite in South Dakota and Montana. They have reported some lignite deposits containing as much as 0.1% uranium.

Coal samples were analyzed for uranium concentration in the coals from the Western United States and approximately 300 coals from the Illinois Basin. In the majority of samples, concentrations of uranium fall in the range from slightly below 1 to 4 parts per million (ppm). Coals with more than 20 ppm uranium are rare in the United States (http://energy.er.usgs.gov/products/databases/ CoalQual/intro.htm).



Results for the uranium in world coals are as follows (Swaine,1990):

Australia- 0.01-4.5 ppm
Brazil- 2.7-19 ppm
Canada- 0.2-7.2 ppm
China- 0.16-21 ppm
Germany West- less than 1 – 13 ppm
India- 1.1-3.6 ppm.
New Zealand- 0.015-0.46 ppm
South Africa- 1.2- 7.3 ppm
Turkey- 1.4-6.4 ppm
UK- 1.1- 3.0 ppm.

Traces of uranium have been also found in the Permian coals of Jharkhand State of India. Areas are KDH, Dakra, Rohini, and Rai Bachra in the North Karanpura coalfield. Channeled samples were analyzed with the help of XRF instrument.

Occurrence of uranium in coals:

Three hypotheses advanced to explain the occurrence of uranium in some coals were described by Denson (1959) as follows.

1. Syngenetic: Uranium was deposited from surface waters by living plants or in dead organic matter in swamps prior to coalification.
2. Diagenetic: Uranium was introduced into the coal during coalification by waters bringing the uranium from areas marginal to the coal deposits or from the consolidating enclosing sediments.
3. Epigenetic: Uranium was introduced in the coal after coalification and after consolidation of the enclosing sediments by groundwater deriving uranium from hydrothermal sources or from unconformably overlying volcanic rocks.
Uranium is associated with clays, zircon and phosphates and may also be organically bound in coal. The accumulation of uranium in coal may vary markedly from place to place, and the occurrence of uranium in each deposit should be interpreted in relation to the geologic history of the region. Field evidence favors the epigenetic hypothesis of the origin of uranium in U.S. western coals. Secondary concentration of uranium in coal may occur when solution of small quantities of uranium by groundwater from overlying volcanic rocks is followed by downward percolation of these waters through previous strata until the uranium is taken up and retained by the highest of the underlying lignite beds. Application of this theory led to the discovery of uranium-bearing coal in Wyoming, Montana, Idaho and New Mexico.
Most thorium in coal is contained in common phosphate minerals such as monazite or apatite. In contrast, uranium is found in both the mineral and organic fractions of coal. Some uranium may be added slowly over geologic time because organic matter can extract dissolved uranium from ground water. In fly ash, the uranium is more concentrated in the finer sized particles. If during coal combustion some uranium is concentrated on ash surfaces as a condensate, then this surface-bound uranium is potentially more susceptible to leaching. However, no obvious evidence of surface enrichment of uranium has been found in the hundreds of fly ash particles examined by USGS researchers.
Most coal also contains potassium-40, lead-210, and radium-226. The total levels are generally about the same as in other rocks of the Earth's crust. Most emerge from a power station in the light flyash, which is fused and chemically stable, or the bottom ash. Some 99% of flyash is typically retained in a modern power station (90% is some older ones), and this is buried in an ash dam.
The amounts of radionuclides involved are noteworthy. In Victoria, 65 million tonnes of brown coal is burned annually for electricity production. This contains about 1.6 ppm uranium and 3.0-3.5 ppm thorium, hence about 100 tonnes of uranium and 200 tonnes of thorium is buried in landfill each year in the Latrobe Valley. Australia exports 235 Mt/yr of coal with 1 to 2 ppm uranium and about 3.5 ppm thorium in it, hence up to 400 tonnes of uranium and about 800 tonnes of thorium could conceivably be added to published export figures (http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf30.html).
Other coals are quoted as ranging up to 25 ppm U and 80 ppm Th. In the USA, ash from coal-fired power plants contains on average 1.3 ppm of uranium and 3.2 ppm of thorium, giving rise to 1200 tonnes of uranium and 3000 tonnes of thorium in ash each year (for 955 million tonnes of coal used for power generation). Applying these concentration figures to world coal consumption for power generation (7800 Mt/yr) gives 10,000 tonnes of uranium and 25,000 tonnes of thorium per year(http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf30.html).

Reference:
Berthoud, E.L. 1875. on the occurrence of uranium, silver, iron etc., in the Tertiary Formation of Colorado Territory. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., Philadelphia, 27, 363-365.
Breger, I.A., Deul, M. and Meyrowitz, R. 1955. Geochemistry and mineralogy of a uraniferous subbituminous coal. Econ. Geol., 50, 610-624.
Bouska, V. 1981. Geochemistry of Coal. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York.
Denson, N.M., 1959. Uranium in coal in the Western United States, U.S. Geological Survey Bull. 1055.
Gill, J.R. 1959. Reconnaissance for uranium in the Ekalaka Lignite field, Carter County, Montana. US Geological Survey, Bull. 1055.
Gott, G.B. 1952. Uranium in black shales, lignites and limestones in the United States. Selected papers on uranium deposits in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Circ.220,Washington. 31-35.
Swaine, D.J. 1990. Trace elements in coal. Butterworths, London.
Valkovic, V. 1983. Trace elements in coal. CRC Press, Inc. Florida.
Vine, J.D. 1956. Uranium-bearing coal in the United States. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., No 300, 405-41.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Radiation leak in New Delhi.

Cases of missing radioactive metals were also reported from Jharkhand State of India.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
A radiation leak in a west Delhi industrial area triggered panic in New Delhi after a scrap dealer and his three employees suffered burn injuries and fell unconscious after coming in contact with a mysterious shining object on Wednesday.

Scientists from the crisis management group of the Department of Atomic Energy and the Atomic Energy Regulation Board on Friday carried out a survey of the extent of radiation in West Delhi's Mayapuri industrial area.

DAE sources said thorough investigations were being carried out to determine how much the radiation has spread and all other aspects of the incident including how it started.
Scientist believe that the radioactive object is Cobalt-60.

The Bhabha Atomic Research Centre has also rushed a team of scientists to Delhi to ascertain the extent of the leak.

From where did this radioactive metals came into the shop? All these radioactive metals are kept in tight security in hospital, industries and other sectors where it has multipurpose use. Either it is a case of carelessness or it might have been stolen.

Few years ago radioactive materials were reported to be stolen from Jamshedpur and Coal mines near Ranchi city, in Jharkhand State of India. The police are yet to make a breakthrough.

According to the earlier news papers report, large quantities of highly radioactive material were stolen from a steel plant in the Jamshedpur city of Jharkhand. Three containers with the radioactive element Cobalt-60 each weighing 41 kilograms were stolen from the Tata Steel factory in August 2003.

In January 2006 uranium-based ash analyser was stolen from a Jharkhand colliery, near Ranchi city. The theft took place in a Central Coalfield Ltd (CCL) colliery in the Rajrappa coalmine area in Hazaribag district Dec 22.
Ash analyser is used to analyse the quality of coal, especially the ash percentage in coal. The analysis technique uses low-energy gamma radiation directed through the material on a moving conveyor. Cobalt- 60 is used in many common industrial applications, such as in levelling devices and thickness gauges, Cobalt-60 is also used for industrial radiography to detect metal flaws.
Cobalt-60 undergoes radioactive decay with the emission of beta particles and strong gamma radiation. It ultimately decays to non radioactive nickel. The half-life of cobalt-60 is 5.27 years. Most exposure to cobalt-60 takes place intentionally during medical tests and treatments. Such exposures are carefully controlled to avoid the adverse health impacts and to maximize the benefits of medical care. Accidental exposures may occur as the result of loss or improper disposal of medical and industrial radiation sources. Though relatively rare, exposure has also occurred by accidental mishandling of a source at a metal recycling facility or steel mill.
People may ingest cobalt-60 with food and water that has been contaminated, or may inhale it in contaminated dust. The major concern posed by cobalt-60, however, is external exposure to its strong gamma rays. This may occur if you are exposed to an orphaned source, or if you come in contact with waste from a nuclear reactor
It is not only the threat of radiation but if it falls in the wrong hand situation may be worse. It can be used to make 'dirty bombs' with the help of these radioactive metals.
A dirty bomb - or radiological dispersion bomb - is a conventional explosive packaged with radioactive material. It is cruder and cheaper than a nuclear bomb but can cause explosive destruction and radiation damage,

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Importance of Medical Geology in present environment.

It is now a globally emerging discipline.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
Humans live in lands. Most of them live in intimate contact with the immediate geological environment, obtaining their food and water directly from it. The unique geochemistry of these tropical environments have a marked influence on their health, giving rise to diseases that affect millions of people. The origin of these diseases is geologic as exemplified by dental and skeletal fluorosis, iodine deficiency disorders, trace element imbalances to name a few.

Medical Geology is an emerging scientific discipline that examines the impacts that geologic materials and processes have on human and ecosystem health. Medical Geology:
· Identifies and characterizes natural and anthropogenic sources of harmful materials in the environment.
· Predicts the movement and alteration of chemical, infectious, and other disease-causing agents over time and space.
· Provides an understanding of how people are exposed to harmful materials and describes what can be done to minimize or prevent such exposure.

The civilized existence of man is made possible by keeping him physically healthy through the application of medical knowledge. Although this is an important aspect of life, surprisingly little serious attention appears to have been given to it by the very persons who should have realized its important role in the study of the effects of various elements and metals on the human body.
Every day we eat, drink and breathe minerals and trace elements, never giving a thought to what moves from the environment and into our bodies. For most of us this interaction with natural materials is harmless, perhaps even beneficial, supplying us with essential nutrients. However, for some, the interaction with minerals and trace elements can have devastating, even fatal effects. These interactions are the realm of medical geology, a fast-growing field that not only involves geoscientists but also medical, public health, veterinary, agricultural, environmental and biological scientists. Medical geology is the study of the effects of geologic materials and processes on human, animal and plant health, with both good and possibly hazardous results.

The relationship between the Earth's surface that we humans inhabit and our health is under debate. The fact that a continuum and indelible link exists is not in doubt. We have obtained food, water, and shelter since Homo arrived, but in the twentieth century we have learned that disease as well as health may by derived from our environment.

The geochemical distribution and biochemical availability of the elements that are required for human existence are not uniformly distributed over the Earth's surface. For example, low concentrations of iodine (I) characterize the soils and rocks at high elevations and in limestone terrains. This is a natural global phenomenon. Medical acumen and geostatistical and epidemiological investigations have identified iodine as an essential nutrient. The thick necks that were depicted in ancient Chinese scrolls, and the cretinism found in mountainous regions, are now recognized as symptoms of the endemic disease goitre. Jharkhand and other Eastern states in India are Iodine deficiency zone. Reduction, but unfortunately not eradication, of this preventable malady is now possible through the use of iodine-enriched table salt and oils.

Fluorine (F), another element that is a constituent of some minerals, is now added to drinking water to minimize the development of dental caries, especially in children. Apart from the beneficial effects of maintaining a healthy oral cavity to aid mastication and minimize pain, it is probable that ingestion of fluorine in small amounts (parts per million) over a lifetime will stave off osteoporosis, or at least serve to preserve the mineral materials in the skeleton in old age. It was the recognition of a connection between high natural fluorine concentrations (100 ppm) in the drinking waters of certain localities in Oklahoma and India and overabundant calcium phosphate mineral deposition in the skeleton that most clearly illustrates the essential and continuing basic interactions between geology, geochemistry, medicine, and biochemistry. The fluorine effect, fully researched, led to applications aimed at reduction, if not prevention, of disease.

Radon is a naturally occurring colourless, odourless gas that is emitted from rocks containing minerals rich in the transuranic elements. The occupational health effects, in particular lung cancer, suffered by some European coal-miners who mine such rocks were ascribed to radiation, but may equally well have been induced by smoking. Granites that underlie portions of the north-east of the United States (New England) are known to contain minerals that emit radon. Recent epidemiological studies that measured environmental exposure (the average was less than 4 picocuries for the region) were not able to demonstrate an association between the incidence of lung cancer and sites where radon concentrations (possible doses) were elevated.
In its broadest sense, medical geology studies exposure to or deficiency of trace elements and minerals; inhalation of ambient and anthropogenic mineral dusts and volcanic emissions; transportation, modification and concentration of organic compounds; and exposure to radionuclides, microbes and pathogens.

Hippocrates and other Hellenic writers recognized that environmental factors affected geographical distributions of human diseases 2,400 years ago. And in 300 B.C., Aristotle noted lead poisoning in miners. Rocks and minerals have also been used for thousands of years to treat various maladies such as the plague, smallpox and fevers.

The geological profession has made considerable progress in studies on the distribution of elements, even in traces, in rock materials to understand their manner of evolution. A geochemist who takes to such studies rarely gives a thought as to which of the elements he has been examining are beneficial or harmful to the human race although the civilized existence of man requires a number of elements and metals. The soil which covers the underlying rock, in the process of weathering, concentrates some of these elements and even transfers some to plants growth on such soil, while groundwater which filters through the soil profile dissolves certain other elements. Civilized man, in order to coax more from the soil, adds fertilizers and uses pesticides for destroying pests which affect crop growth. Also with the good intention of keeping the human body in good conditions, he introduces certain elements in the form of drugs under medical advice. The geological factors which control the distribution and dissemination of these elements, as also their presumed therapeutical effects, is a factor of great importance to which geologists must direct their attention.

The types of rocks that form geologic units in the Earth’s crust supply most of the raw materials from which soils are formed and from which water derives it inorganic constituents. The compositions of what we eat and drink thus depend in part upon the compositions of the source rocks. The contents of individual trace elements vary widely with rock type. Chromium, titanium, nickel, and cobalt are conspicuously concentrated in low-silica igneous rocks that are quantitatively unimportant. Arsenic, iodine, molybdenum, and selenium are conspicuously concentrated in shale and clay. Metallic elements present in source rocks in small amounts-the so called minor elements or trace elements- have been shown to have important effects on human and animal health, resulting from their excess or deficiencies in soils, waters, and plants.

Rocks like Igneous, Sedimentary, and Metamorphics contribute trace elements to the water bodies like fluoride, Arsenic, lead, copper, mercury, zinc, etc. Jharkhand state in India provides an ideal opportunity for the study of the effect of geology on human health. The vast majority of the people of Jharkhand still live in rural areas within areas termed geochemical provinces. Very broadly, one could say that a geochemical province has characteristic chemical composition in soil, water stream sediments and rocks, enabling their delineation from others. The chemical composition is presumed to be have an impact on the health of the inhabitants of the particular geochemical province, particularly because of the fact that their food and water are obtained mostly from the terrain itself. This leads to the concept of "diseases of geochemical origin". Among these are dental fluorosis, iodine deficiency disorders (IDDs) and Arsenic toxicity based diseases.

Author has worked on distribution of trace elements in Permian coals of North Karanpura Coalfield of Jharkhand State of India and its environmental impact. It was found that concentration of arsenic in coal samples range from <0.01 to 0.49ppm with an arithmetic mean of 0.15ppm. (Priyadarshi, 2004). Concentration of arsenic is low compared to most world coals. Average ash% is very high (up to 32.51%). Average concentration of arsenic in the sediments of mine water was 1.4 ppm. Though the concentration of arsenic is low in the surface water ( 0.001-0.002 ppm) it may still affect the local habitants especially during summer season when the consumption of water increases many folds. Main source of arsenic in the water bodies is from the coals of the researched area. Elements like lead, barium, strontium, boron, etc. were also present in sufficient amount in the coals.

The low arsenic concentrations of the coal studied could be related to the geological characteristics of the source area in the basin and to a resulting low degree of arsenic mineralization (realgar or orpiment) of the synsedimentary solutions, which resulted in a paucity of arsenic in the system.

A detailed study has been presented on groundwater metal contents of Sahebgunj district in the state of Jharkhand, India with special reference to arsenic. Both tubewell and well waters have been studied separately with greater emphasis on tubewell waters. Groundwaters of all the nine blocks of Sahebgunj district have been surveyed for iron, manganese, calcium, magnesium, copper and zinc in addition to arsenic. Groundwaters of three blocks of Sahebgunj, namely, Sahebgunj, Rajmahal and Udhawa have been found to be alarmingly contaminated with arsenic present at or above 10 ppb.

Bakhari village, situated about 20 km from the Ranchi district headquarters in Jharkhand state , has a population of nearly 700, comprising mostly tribal and members of socially underprivileged groups. Two-thirds of the villagers have reportedly developed physical deformities as all the sources of drinking water in Bakhari have excess fluoride content.

It is to be expected that in areas characterized by metal-bearing formations, metals will also occur at elevated levels in the water and bottom sediments of the particular area. There is evidence that the high mercury content in rocks encountered in the catchment of La Grande River, Canada, may be responsible for high mercury levels in organisms (Boyle and Jonasson,1973). It was found that the Aphebian Shale in central and northern Quebec- near the headwaters of the La Grande- contained mercury levels averaging 0.5 ppm , which these authors regard as being high.

A study conducted by Colbourne et.al. (1975) confirmed that the stream sediment patterns for arsenic and copper in the Dartmoor area of South-West England may be correlated with significant enrichment of these elements in soils derived from rocks within the metamorphic aureole around the Dartmoor granitic intrusion. Previously it had been concluded that the source of arsenic within the metamorphosed country rocks was the result of hydrothermal activity during phases of granitic intrusion. Similarly, geothermal sources in North Island are a natural source for mercury enrichment.

All living tissues are composed mainly of eleven elements, but to remain viable, minute amounts of a few elements of the transition series also must be present. These act as mediators of the biocatalysts, the enzymes. The trace elements that have been most extensively studied are : Fe, Cu, Mn, Mg, Mo, and Zn. The body as it ages concentrates a large number of other elements; many of these, when present in excess, have been reported as being responsible for the introduction of cancer. Experiments reveal that nickel, cadmium, and some chromium compounds are true metal carcinogens. Arsenic has been strongly indicted as a primary human carcinogen. Asbestos may prove to be a carrier for the carcinogenic metals, nickel and chromium. In the 1980s, earth scientists helped medical scientists to recognize that there was more than one type of material called asbestos, and that the different asbestos materials are not equally carcinogenic. Chrysotile asbestos, for example, is commonly regarded as being less carcinogenic than amphibole asbestos. The last several years have seen renewed public attention on the potential health effects of asbesti form minerals that occur naturally as trace constituents in rocks or mineral deposits. For example, in 1999 the Seattle Post-Intelligencer brought nationwide media and scientific attention to asbestos-related health problems in residents of Libby, Mont. Many residents have diseases that have since been attributed to their exposure to amphibole asbestos minerals. The minerals were naturally inter grown with the vermiculite mined and processed at Libby.

Mercury is regarded as the most toxic metal, followed by cadmium, lead and others although there is no rigid order of toxicity. Contamination of the aqueous environment by cadmium appears to be less widespread than by mercury but has nonetheless hazardous effects on humans. During 1947 an unusual and painful disease of a “rheumatic nature” was recorded in the case of 44 patients from villages (e.g., Fuchu) on the banks of the Jintsu River, Toyama Prefecture, Japan. During subsequent years, it became known as the “itai-itai” disease (meaning “ouch-ouch”) in accordance with the patients shrieks resulting from painful skeletal deformities. However the cause of this disease was completely unknown until 1961, when sufficient evidence led to the postulation that cadmium played a role in its development.

Exposure to toxic levels of trace elements is one of the widespread forms of environmental health problems. Millions of people worldwide suffer health problems because they have been exposed to arsenic, lead, fluorine, mercury, uranium, etc. The devastation caused by excess arsenic in drinking water in Bangladesh, West Bengal India and elsewhere has been headline news. An estimated 25 to 75 million people are at risk of arsenosis in that region.

In Guizhou Province, China, the cool, damp autumn weather forces villagers to bring their harvests of chili peppers and corn indoors to dry. They hang the peppers over unvented stoves that, until the middle of the last century, had been fueled by wood. Due to the destruction of the forests, wood is now scarce so the villagers have turned to the plentiful outcrops of coal for heating, cooking and drying their harvests. But mineralizing solutions in this area have deposited enormous concentrations of arsenic - up to 35,000 parts per million - and other trace elements in these coals.

The chili peppers dried over these arsenic-rich coals are a key component of the villagers' diet and, unfortunately, their principal source of arsenic. Thousands of villagers are now suffering from arsenic poisoning and exhibit typical symptoms, including hyperpigmentation (flushed appearance, freckles), hyperkeratosis (scaly lesions on the skin, generally concentrated on the hands and feet), Bowen's disease (dark, horny, pre-cancerous lesions of the skin), and squamous cell carcinoma.

Most trace elements in drinking water are of concern from a public health point of view because of potential for excess above recommended limits. However, some trace elements are essential to health and so are required to be present at certain concentrations in drinking water or food. Iodine is one such essential element. Deficiency in dietary iodine can lead to a number of iodine-deficiency disorders (IDDs) in humans. No regulations or recommendations are placed on concentrations of iodine in drinking water because such standards are imposed to regulate upper rather than lower limits.

As iodine is an essential element for humans, there is considerable interest in its environmental geochemistry. It is unique amongst the elements in that most iodine in the terrestrial environment does not derive from normal weathering of crustal rocks but derives through volatilisation from the oceans, which represent the major reservoir of iodine on the Earth. As a result of this major source of environmental iodine, soils in coastal regions are strongly enriched in iodine, while those far removed from marine influence generally have low iodine contents.

Iodine concentrations in groundwaters (and surface waters) largely lie in the range 0.01–70 µg/l, depending on geographical location and local geology and soils. Higher concentrations can be found in saline waters such as coastal and arid or semi-arid areas. The principal sources of iodine in groundwater are aquifers and soils and the atmosphere. Iodine is found in low concentrations in most rocks because it is incompatible with most rock-forming (silicate) minerals. It may be present in higher concentrations in sulphide minerals, organic matter and iron oxides. Hence sulphide-, organic- and iron- rich rocks and soils tend to have the highest concentrations. Mineral veins (rich in sulphide minerals) and hydrothermal solutions are also relatively concentrated. Of the sedimentary rocks, muds and shales typically have the highest concentrations. Weathered rocks often have higher iodine concentrations than their pristine equivalents, presumably due to interaction with groundwater.

Uranium is present in the environment in low concentrations in all parts of the world, the most abundant deposits being in sedimentary rocks. The main areas of the world with rich uranium deposits are the Colorado plateau in Wyoming in the United States, Blind River and Beaver Lodge districts in Canada, the Erz Mountains in central Europe, the Ural Mountains in Russia, the Rand Mountains in South Africa, the French Alps, Radium Hill in Australia, Jadugoda in India and the Pirinean Mountain range in Spain. Open pit mining has been the preferred way of uranium production, but some deposits are too deep for this type of mining because it necessitates deep underground mining. The range of uranium content of the most ores is between 0.1-1.0% of U3O8. However, much higher grades are frequently found, presenting higher radiation hazards to miners from beta radiation from the ore and inhalation of uranium dust suspended in the air of the mining environment.

Normal functioning of the kidney, brain, liver, heart, and numerous other systems can be affected by uranium exposure, because in addition to being weakly radioactive, uranium is a toxic metal.

As we contemplate an increase in world population and an ageing population, it becomes apparent that evaluating long-term exposure to natural materials in our environment makes cooperation and coordinated study of geology and medicine essential. The intertwining of these areas of knowledge should enable us to continue to improve health and combat disease, and contribute to better living conditions for all people.

Medical geology, a long-recognized but perhaps underutilized discipline, presents the geoscience community with tremendous opportunities for collaborative work with the biomedical and ecological research communities. Such collaborations have great potential to help understand, mitigate and possibly eradicate environmental health problems that have plagued humans for thousands of years.

Reference:

Boyle, R. W., Jonasson, I.R. 1973. The geochemistry of arsenic and its use as an indicator element in geochemical prospecting. J. Geochem. Explor.2, 251-296.

Colbourne, P., Alloway, B.J., Thornton, I., 1975. Arsenic and heavy metals in soils associated with regional geochemical anaomalies in southwest England. Sci. Total Environ. 4, 359-363.

Forstner,U. and Wittmann, G.T.W. 1979. Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.

Priyadarshi, N. 2004. Distribution of arsenic in Permian Coals of North Karanpura coalfield, Jharkhand. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, 63, 533-536.

Radhakrishna, B.P. 2005. Medical Geology. Jr. of The Geological Society of India, v.66, no.4. p.395.

http://energy.er.usgs.gov/health_environment/medical_geology/
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/DU-Medical-Effects-Mar99.htm
http://www.wateraid.org/documents/plugin_documents/iodine1.pdf.pdf
http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2009AM/finalprogram/abstract_161522.htm
http://www.agiweb.org/geotimes/nov01/feature_medgeo.html
http://science.jrank.org/pages/47843/medical-geology.html

Saturday, May 23, 2009

Radioactive gas Radon may affect the people of Ranchi city in India.

Radon problem cannot be ruled out in the houses of Ranchi city in India.
by
Dr. Nitish Priyadarshi
Fig. House build on the rocks in Ranchi city.
Earth has many ways to kill us. We keep on the lookout, and rightly so, for volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, landslides, flooding, cosmic impacts, climate change and falling rocks on the highway. Should we still worry about radon?
You remember radon—that radioactive gas that comes up from the soil and collects in basements and ground floors, sometimes in well water. Radon is a prominent villain in many countries. Blamed for tens of thousands of deaths from lung cancer. Like asbestos, radon was looked at more kindly when it was new, and today it too is more feared than it deserves.
Radon Geology:
To the geologist, radon is interesting, not worrisome. For one thing, radon starts with uranium, which is worth knowing about for its energy content and its important role in the Earth's heat budget.

Uranium turns to lead via a long, slow cascade of nuclear decay, and radon sits at an important point in that process.

Not only does the radon nuclide decay quickly, with a half-life less than four days, but the next four nuclides in the cascade decay with a combined half-life less than an hour. In other words, radon packs a powerful dose of radioactivity, and because it is a gaseous element, it can drift out of the minerals where it forms into the air. Thus it's a good signal of uranium, even for buried deposits.

Humans have always been exposed throughout their period of existence to naturally occurring ionising radiation. Specifically, naturally occurring radionuclides are present in variable amounts in our environment. To assess radiological health hazards, naturally occurring radionuclides are being measured in soil, sand, marble, bricks etc throughout the world.

Terrestrial radiation comes from radioactive elements that were present at the time the earth was formed. They continue to decay and form additional radioactive materials.
Unusual soil composition has increased background radiation twenty-five fold or more in a few areas in the world. Locations with high background radiation in the soil, mainly from uranium, include the Rocky Mountains, Kerala India, coastal regions of Brazil, granite rock areas of France, and the northern Nile Delta.

Seeing the rock types and its mineral composition Radon problem cannot be ruled out in the houses of Ranchi city of Jharkhand State in India. This fact was justified by a published report of Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan. According to the report Air-gamma dose rate was 0.30 μSv/h on the surface in the densely populated area in the city. In Ranchi the concentration of K-40 (potassium-40) and thorium is high. Concentration of Radium-226 was 75 Bq/Kg in the soils.

Very interesting thing in the Ranchi city is that name of one of its major road is RADIUM ROAD. Till today no body knows from where did this name came from. Name of this road exists from the British rule in India i.e. before 1947.

Seeing the presence of apatite, sphene and zircon in the Ranchi rocks, presence of Uranium cannot be ruled out. According to the report Uranium concentration is also high in Ranchi. All these concentrations are of natural origin. Radioactivity in the bricks made by the local soil may pose threat to the people living in the houses made by these bricks.

When Uranium is there, presence of Radon cannot be ruled out. It is radioactive gas that comes up from the soil and collects in basements and ground floors, sometimes in well water. Radon is a prominent villain in the United States, blamed for tens of thousands of deaths from lung cancer.
Even the granites of the Daltonganj area of Jharkhand state contain anomalous uranium values. Uranium mineralization has also been observed in the granitic rocks comprising the southern periphery of the Hutar basin of Daltonganj area. The Proterozoic granitoids, forming the provenance for the Hutar and Auranga subbasin, have been analyzed which revealed uranium content up to 520 ppm. ( Virnave, 1999).
The radon in home indoor air can come from two sources, the soil or water supply. The radon in water supply poses an inhalation risk and an ingestion risk. Research has shown that risk of lung cancer from breathing radon in air is much larger than the risk of stomach cancer from swallowing water with radon in it. Most of the risk from radon in water comes from radon released into the air when water is used for showering and other household purposes.
Radon in home water in not usually a problem when its source is surface water. A radon in water problem is more likely when its source is ground water, e.g., a private well or a public water supply system that uses ground water.
From last several years people of Ranchi are becoming more dependent on ground water for their daily uses. Indiscriminate deep borings are rampant in the granite rocks of Ranchi city. People are going more and more deeper for search for water.
People of Jharkhand state are unaware of danger from Radon gas.
Radon loves fractures because they set it free. Solid mineral grains are a pretty good trap for gases, but break the grains and the gas escapes. So just having rocks rich in uranium is not enough—they must be fractured, too.
Ranchi rocks are filled with fractures and joints. Ground waters are mined through these fractures and joints. So threat of Radon Poisoning looms large in Ranchi city.

Even the houses build on the rocks filled with cracks and fractures are under threat of Radon poisoning inside the house. Most of the radon indoors is contributed by the ground underneath buildings.
The amount of radon entering buildings from the ground is influenced by the following four factors.
a) Radon concentrations in soil gas: This depends on the concentration of the immediate precursor of Rn-222, Ra-226, in rocks and soils. Elevated levels of radium are found in some granites, limestone's and sandstone's and other geologies.
b) Permeability of the ground: This depends on the nature of the rock and soil under the building Disturbed ground can have greatly increased permeability. Usually the radon comes from the ground within a few metres of the building, but if the ground is particularly permeable or fissured it may come from a greater distance.
c) Entry routes into homes: Concrete floors often have cracks around the edges and gaps around services entries such as mains water supply, electricity or sewage pipes. If homes have suspended timber floors the gaps between the floorboards are the major route of entry. Pathways for soil gas to enter houses are often concealed, and vary between apparently identical houses.
d) Under-pressure of homes: Atmospheric pressure is usually lower indoors than outdoors owning to the warm indoor air rising; this creates a gentle suction at ground level in the building through the so-called `stack effect'. Wind blowing across chimneys and windows can also create an under-pressure (the `Bernoulli effect'). The result is that the building draws in outside air, typically at the rate of one air change per hour. Most of this inflow comes through doors and windows, but perhaps 1% or so comes from the ground. In an average house, this amounts to a couple of cubic metres of soil gas entering the house each hour. The radon concentration in a building depends on the rate of entry of the radon and the rate at which it is removed by ventilation. Increasing the ventilation rate will not always decrease the radon concentrations, however, because ventilation rate and under-pressure are related, and some ways of increasing ventilation, such as the use of extract fans or opening upstairs windows, can also increase the under-pressure.

Recently high concentrations of radioactive gas radon have been detected in Bengalooru’s groundwater, which means a higher risk of stomach cancer for those who drink it.A team from the Bangalore University and the Baba Atomic Research Centre in Mumbai collected 78 samples of water from bore wells, shallow wells, surface water and the supplied drinking water in Bengalooru. More than half the samples contained radon in concentrations up to a thousand times the permissible limit of 11.1 Becquerel per litre.

In the case of Bengalooru (old name Bangalore) it is the large reserves of granite that is causing the problem. Being highly soluble, radon easily dissolves in groundwater. The rate at which radon is released from rocks depends on the porosity of the rocks and the intensity of water flow.
Radon is a cancer-causing natural radioactive gas that we can’t see, smell or taste. Its presence in the home can pose a danger to family's health. Radon is the leading cause of lung cancer among non-smokers. Radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in America and claims about 20,000 lives annually.
Any home can have a radon problem. This means new and old homes, well-sealed and drafty homes, and homes with or without basements. In fact, people and their family are most likely to get greatest radiation exposure at home. That is where they spend most of their time. Jharkhand government should come forward to analyze the amount of Radon present in groundwater and in the air inside the house.
Sources:
Virnave, S.N. Nuclear Geology and Atomic Mineral Resources. Bharati Bhawan, Patna. 169.
http://www.epa.gov/iaq/radon/
http://www.epa.gov/radon/healthrisks.html
http://www.epa.gov/radon/pubs/hmbyguid.html#6.
http://www.radonguide.com/sources-of-radon-in-buildings.html
http://www.downtoearth.org.in/full6.asp?foldername=20090215&filename=news&sec_id=4&sid=21